Author Archive for David Brown – Page 58

Medical Mistakes Ruin Lives

In April 2017, Rickie and Judy Huitt were at The Iowa Clinic, located in Des Moines, where Rickie was scheduled for an operation. Earlier that year, the retired John Deere factory worker had been diagnosed with prostate cancer that required surgery. Dr. Joy Trueblood, one of the pathologists at the clinic, performed the procedure, removing his prostate gland. However, after another pathologist inspected the purportedly affected gland, it was determined the organ was never cancerous.

What Happened?

It seems as though Dr. Trueblood confused tissue sample slides from another male patient, that had cancer and attributed them to Mr. Huitt. The outcome of the surgery caused local nerve damage to the area, which resulted in incontinence and erectile dysfunction. It is difficult to comprehend the emotions the couple experienced after discovering the truth about this unnecessary treatment.

Unfortunately, this happens more than people could imagine. According to a study released in 2016 by Johns Hopkins, more than 250,000 cases of medical errors are the cause of death in the United States. Although Rickie Huitt survived, the wrong action taken by the physician made a devastating impact on him and his wife’s life.

Proper Compensation…

The couple filed a suit against The Iowa Clinic and Dr. Trueblood, seeking 15 million dollars in damages; however, Jack Hilmes, the attorney representing the clinic suggested that the sum of money awarded should be only $750,000. He stated that Rickie was 67 years old and although the operation he had was not required, he could still perform activities, such as mowing the yard and driving a vehicle to pick up his grandkids from school.

When Mrs. Huitt took the stand, she tearfully stated that the love life they had before had diminished and because of involuntary urination, he has to use several urine-absorbent pads every day. In addition, she felt their lives would never be complete again because of this major error by the medical community.

Nick Rowley, a famous malpractice suit lawyer, was the leader of the four-member team of attorneys The Huitts had hired to present their case in court. In his closing argument, Mr. Huitt told the jury that Rickie had lost his manhood and it could not be restored. They deserved the amount for which they were asking.

In the end, the Polk County jury awarded Rickie and Judy Huitt 12.25 million dollars.

Parkland Survivors and Their Families File a Variety of Lawsuits

More than a year after the tragic shooting in Parkland, Florida, the lawsuits and other various legal actions filed by the families and survivors have been winding their way through the courts. The most recent step forward occurred in early April of 2019 when 26 families and survivors placed legal actions on the grounds of negligence against the Broward County Sherriff’s Department, Stoneman Douglas High School, and a variety of other defendants. However, their suits will be delayed as the state of Florida and other governmental agencies attempt to work out the complex web of legal liability from the tragic event.

A compensation fund for the victims was originally discussed, but it appears to have lost momentum in the Florida legislature. The current legislative session comes to an end on May 3rd, and it is extremely unlikely that the fund will be discussed and passed in the time remaining. Lawyers for the victims and school board officials are casting blame over the failure of the compensation bill to pass, while legislators point to the already overloaded schedule and the issues involved in taxpayer compensation for the tragedy.

Meanwhile, the Florida Supreme Court is examining the question of whether the Parkland shooting should be considered, from the legal point of view, as one large shooting or as a series of small ones. This is a critical distinction, as the insurance companies would pay the survivors and their families approximately eleven times more compensation if it is seen as a number of individual shootings. The Florida Supreme Court’s decision will likely be foundational to all subsequent suits and challenges.

The coming lawsuits represent the survivors of ten individuals who were murdered on February 14, 2018, and twelve survivors who sustained physical wounds. Some legal actions cover more than one victim, while others represent groups. The Stoneman Douglas school has retained a lobbying firm to advocate for the taxpayer-funded victims’ fund, and they claim that their actions to secure this compensation demonstrate good faith on their part. The $160 million dollar fund, if passed, would provide more compensation than the insurance companies would alone, but in order to draw from it, the plaintiffs would have to agree to drop their legal cases. With the legislature likely to adjourn before passing a bill enacting this fund, the survivors and families face the possibility of another year in legal limbo.

Woman Falls to Her Death After Wandering from Retirement Home

Retirement homes are tasked with providing care, safety, and peace of mind to their residents. Even a minor oversight can lead to tragedy, a fact that the family of 78-year-old Barbara Jones-Davis knows all too well.

On the night of July 8, 2018, Jones-Davis wandered from Wesley Enhanced Living at Stapeley in Germantown, PA never to return. Living with dementia, Jones-Davis had a history of wandering, and her glaucoma made it difficult for her to safely navigate the grounds. Cameras showed her walking unattended for 23 minutes before she fell 15 feet from the unfenced property onto the concrete sidewalk on West Washington Lane. She suffered a skull fracture, bleeding in the brain, and broken bones, ultimately succumbing to her injuries later that night.

Jones-Davis’ daughters, Heather Davis-Stukes and Pamela Davis-Edwards, sued Stapeley on the grounds of negligence and wrongful death. The retirement home expressed their commitment to safety and condolences for Jones-Davis’ family, but could not provide further details on the matter.

Moving to a retirement home was a tough but necessary choice for Jones-Davis. Her daughters worried constantly about her worsening dementia and glaucoma and believed she needed more supervision. Jones-Davis initially refused to move to Stapeley in 2015, but reluctantly accepted in 2017 at her daughters’ behest. The sisters picked Stapeley for its beauty and myriad of activities. They also believed that their mother was becoming too isolated and needed to socialize more.

The suit mentions multiple occasions on which Jones-Davis was found wandering both inside and outside the building. Stapeley caregivers assured her daughters that their mother’s cognition had improved following treatment for a urinary tract infection, opting them to keep her in personal care rather than transferring her to the more monitored memory care. The sisters alleged that the staff knew she needed more supervision, but neglected to provide additional safeguards such as a wander guard, or bands that trigger locks or alarms when worn through a checkpoint.

Daniel Jeck, the lawyer arguing the case, deemed Jones-Davis’ death “totally preventable.” He also affirmed that his clients’ main goal was to understand the exact circumstances that led to their mother’s death and to improve safety at the retirement home.

Mother of Waukegan Mayor Will Dismiss Lawsuit Against Library and City for Fall on Sidewalk

On Monday, Lake County Board Vice Chairwoman Mary Ross Cunningham announced that she would drop a lawsuit that she filed against the city of Waukegan and the Waukegan Public Library. Cunningham, who is the mother of the mayor of Waukegan, had filed a lawsuit seeking $50,000 damages for a fall that took place outside the library in February of last year.

According to Mayor Sam Cunningham, an attorney representing the Waukegan Public Library is handling the case rather than the city’s regular attorney. He noted that officials would develop a strategy to deal with the potential conflict of interest should the city become involved.

The mayor said that he had known about the fall, but that he did not know that his mother was planning to sue. Mary Ross Cunningham said that she didn’t inform her son about the lawsuit because she believed the library was an entity separate from the city. However, even though the Waukegan Public Library possesses its own governing board, it is still part of Waukegan. The Waukegan possesses authority over how the public library is governed and it approves a property tax on its behalf.

According to Mary Ross Cunningham, the fall occurred when she was leaving a meeting at the library. She tripped on a section of broken sidewalk and fell, losing consciousness. Eventually, her niece took her to Vista Medical Center.

Eventually, Cunningham was discharged from the hospital. However, when she returned home, she couldn’t move. Ultimately, she had to spend an additional week at the Advocate Condell Medical Center in Libertyville. According to Cunningham, the fall caused her to suffer a re-injury of a disk in her back.

Retired Circuit Judge Jane Waller, another official of Lake County, received an award of $110,500 for an injury she suffered after she tripped on a sidewalk covered in snow in Waukegan.

The library’s attorney has not responded to requests for additional information. The attorney of Cunninghan declined to comment on the lawsuit because he doesn’t have the permissions to do so.

Boy’s foot is crushed on Universal Studios’ E.T. ride, lawsuit claims

While on vacation, an 11-year-old boy from Brazil had his leg and foot crushed while riding on the E.T. ride at Universal Studios. This incident occurred in late January, according to a lawsuit the mother filed. In late February, Roberta Perez filed the suit, seeking a minimum of $15,000 in damages for the incident that occurred on January 31.

During the incident, the left foot of Tiago Perez became stuck between the cement offloading area at the end of the ride and the ride vehicle. Tiago’s shoe fell off and his foot was crushed, according to attorney Edmund Normand, who is based in Orlando. The incident caused Tiago to break multiple bones in his leg, his toes, and his foot in a bloody scene.

The lawsuit claims that Universal Studios has knowledge prior to the accident that the design, testing, manufacture, construction, or operation of the E.T. Adventure ride created a dangerous environment resulting in injuries to the guest. However, Universal Studios continued to portray the ride as safe to the public. Universal Studios declined to comment on the lawsuit or the allegations.

E.T. Adventure is one of the original rides of Universal Studios Florida when the park opened in the year of 1990. The ride involves taking riders up in the air on bicycles to recreate scenes from the movie E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. The rider is then taken to the recreated Green Planet.

According to Normand, Tiago didn’t do anything wrong to cause the accident. He was simply being a normal rider and kid. The feet of Tiago were not on the pedals of the bike. Rather, his feet dangled. However, they were inside the vehicle of the ride as required. Normand is attempting to obtain video footage of the incident. The family of Tiago were witnesses of the incident. His mother sat with Tiago in the same row while the rest of his family members were behind him.

Tiago is currently receiving treatment from an orthopedic surgeon in Brazil. He still hasn’t returned to school many weeks after the incident. Tiago must keep his foot elevated and his hasn’t been able to return to playing on his soccer team in Brazil.

Federal Lawsuit Alleges Charleston County Failed to Protect Paramedic From Sexual Harassment

When Kristin Hammond was sexually harassed while trying to perform her job as a paramedic, she reacted immediately with verbal reprimands. When it happened multiple times, she reported the behavior. She says nothing was done to protect her or other employees who were experiencing the same kind of abuse.

The first incident occurred when the Crew Chief slapped her buttocks as she walked past him after clocking in. Another time, he grabbed her breast, and yet another time he placed his hands on her hips and thrust himself at her in a sexual manner. Ms. Hammond tried to press criminal charges against Crew Chief Malcolm DeFleice, but the charges were dropped without her permission.

Not Part of the Job

After Ms. Hammond started her pursuit of justice, she says other female employees came forward detailing the same kind of complaints. According to the lawsuit, Mr. DeFleice exhibited an ongoing pattern of sexual harassment over a period of five and a half years, during which time he suffered no consequences for his actions.

Not only that, Charleston County Emergency Medical Services (CCEMS) offered no sexual harassment training for supervisors or employees until after Ms. Hammond had filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). There were no policies prohibiting sexual harassment, no policies on how to deal with sexual harassment, and no education on sexual harassment within the organization.

According to the Journal of Emergency Medical Services, sexual harassment against emergency personnel isn’t just a problem women face. When a work environment is rife with interpersonal strife and unpleasant behavior, it causes problems for everyone within the organization. This is a particularly serious problem in an environment like emergency services where individuals depend on each other in sensitive and stressful situations.

Never Again

Ms. Hammond hopes that by filing a lawsuit she can keep these kinds of situations from happening again. What happened in the CCEMS could happen anywhere if the people involved aren’t aware of their rights and responsibilities toward others. The kind of behavior directed toward women in the organization didn’t just affect them, but their families and communities.

When It’s Child Abuse It’s Never Too Late

The statute of limitations has been met, simply meaning no criminal charges can be filed from that point forward, but for at least a few men justice exceeds punishment. So far, five men have come forward to claim child abuse charges and they hope that the expiration of criminal litigation doesn’t mean an expiration on getting justice.

Stories like the one from the Greenwich Time broke in early March, reporting the allegations made by these men, now in their late 40’s to early 50’s in a suit filed against the Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich. According to the filings, the abuse occurred from 1975 to 1984, during which time multiple acts of abuse allegedly took place.

According to court documents, one of the primary perpetrators of the abuse was Andrew Atkinson, who was a member of the club that later became a counselor. Based on the allegations, Atkinson abused the boys as a member and that abuse became more severe once he acquired a leadership role. While the charges are disturbing, to say the least, Atkinson has made a statement and claims to be innocent of any and all charges in the civil suit.

The Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich has also stepped forward to assure children, parents and the public that they actively take and continue to take every necessary precaution to protect their children. Based on statements made by the club, they employ cameras, background checks and other measures to ensure the safety of the children. That is great news today but what about these men? What about all the cases of yesterday?

A well-known fact about child abuse stated in another story said, “… most incidents involving the sexual abuse of a minor go unreported.” These brave men, all these years later, are not letting their unheard reports as children continue to go unheard. If found guilty, these alleged crimes won’t receive a criminal penalty due to the aforementioned statute of limitations. What will happen, however, is that they will be acknowledged and the voices of those children will finally be heard.

We can’t undo a crime, but we can listen, we can make it better and hopefully, we can heal.

Android Inventor Accused of Sexual Misconduct Gets $90 million in Severance and $150 Million Stock Grant

According to a lawsuit, Alphabet Chief Executive Officer Larry Page gave Andy Rubin, creator of Android, a $150 million stock grant without getting any board approval. The company is accused of covering up his alleged misconduct when he left the company in October 2014. At the time of his leaving, Page said that he wished Andy the best in a public statement.

Page did get approval for the compensation package from the board committee over a week after granting the payout to Rubin. In addition to the stock grant, he also received a $90 million severance package.

Allegations in the lawsuit pull Page into the controversy that surrounds how Google handled the sexual harassment complaints against Rubin. Usually, the Alphabet co-founder stays behind the scenes and Google CEO Sundar Pichari deals with the criticism of the company culture. Inventors claim that the board failed in its duties by allowing the harassment to happen and approved the big payouts while keeping the details private. The complaint targets top committee members and executives, including the Alphabet Chief Legal Officer.

An employee had accused Rubin of sexual misconduct. The woman was having an extramarital affair when he forced her into performing oral sex while in a hotel room in 2013. Google investigated the claim and concluded that the claim was credible.

Instead of just firing him and paying him nothing on the way out, he was awarded a huge settlement and that’s what the plaintiffs are complaining about. Rubin’s settlement was paid in installments of about $2 million a month for four years. The last payment ended in November 2018. The lead lawyer has said that their own investigation showed there was harassment, but there were still large payouts.

The complaint was made public in March 2019 at a California state court in San Jose. The suit was originally filed in January, but some claims were blocked from the public.

After news of this, the company was pressured to make changes last year. Tens of thousands of Google workers walked out of work in November to protest how the company handled the sexual misconduct claims. Google has promised to be more forceful in handling these cases.

Walmart Faces Gender Discrimination Lawsuit

Recently, nearly 100 current and former workers filed suit Walmart, the world’s largest retailer. They are alleging unequal pay and lack of opportunity. Just eight years ago, the Supreme Court blocked Walmart from facing the largest gender discrimination case ever brought against an employer.

Now, though, Walmart again faces discrimination lawsuits. These 100 plaintiffs are alleging denial of equal pay in retail store and certain salaried management positions. The plaintiffs are both current and former employees.

The Plaintiffs

The plaintiffs include Francine Radtka, who worked as a deli manager at Walmart in Manatee County, Florida from 1995 to 2000. She expressed concern when she found that other department managers, all men, were making more money than she was. No one listened; she was soon forced to take on more duties without additional pay. She went from working 50 hours a week to nearly 90, without a raise.

Another plaintiff, Jenny Hicks, worked at a Walmart in the same county as Radtka, from 1997 to 2000. Hicks trained managers who went on to make more than her, all male. She left due to lack of upward mobility, even though those same promotions were made available to those she was training.

In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Walmart, in the case of Walmart Stores v Dukes, was too large to constitute a class action suit against. This prompted the plaintiffs to file individual lawsuits against the retailer.

Lindsey Wagner, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, says that female new hires are often placed in cashier roles or associate roles, while men are placed in departments where fast-track promotion opportunities are often available. She also notes several more lawsuits are likely to be filed over the next few months.

In addition to lawsuits, Walmart employees are pushing for the company to reveal the pay gaps between male and female employees. In 2015, a shareholder resolution was introduced that requires Walmart to disclose disparities in pay between male and female employees. However, despite the introduction in 2015, Walmart has still not disclosed those pay disparities. Gender pay gaps at Walmart still exist, as does upward mobility for male employees over females.

Sexual Harassment by Elected Officials Hurting Employees

Being employed by an elected official is no longer bliss, especially in the light of any form of sexual harassment. Recent cases such as those of Sheriff Donald O’Cain and Eddie Fair’s former boss are still pending because of they for elected officials. Serving at ‘will and pleasure’ comes with some form of exposure as the elected officials can employ and fire at will with or without proper reason. The accused have not consented to any of the claims, leaving the harassed at crossroads. In the case of the Simpson’s County scandal, the woman reflected that it was suggested to her that she resigned instead of going against an elected official. Eddie Fair had a tough time getting her case across as the work handbook stated that she could only report the incident to an elected official. And in this case, her alleged harasser.

The situation has put employees working for an elected official in a tight position as they also need to meet the needs of their dependents. Losing a job may be out of the question, and the elected officials are reportedly taking advantage of the desperation to acquire sexual favors and harass them. The law does not have a direct say when it comes to elected official through the Federal government can do something about it. The procedure that involved the higher state is however slow and frustrating. Nick Norris, one of the complainants, advocate said that very little can be done against an elected official and only the voters can decide after the electioneering period.

The House Education Chairman John Moore recently resigned after such allegations were made against him. Philip Gun, the current house speaker, said that the accusations were coming from different fronts and multiple women. The most astonishing thing is that the probe into the issue ended with the resignation with the involved parties citing that nothing could be done if Moore was out of office. Lawmakers are seeking to push a bill that will require public office officials to take responsibility of sexual harassment claims as well as reimburse any state money used to compensate, settle or litigate such claims while they are in office.

Sexual harassment does not only involve inappropriate advances but an offensive language in which the victim can be both male and female.