In January 2008, a canal that was more than 100 years old burst in northern Nevada. The rushing waters sent a two-foot swell coursing through nearby Fernley, much to the dismay and hazard of the small community’s residents. Almost 600 homes were flooded, and their occupants had to be evacuated.
Many who narrowly escaped harm yet lost their properties sued the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District, or TCID. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, or USBR, only needed around two months to determine that TCID failed to prevent vermin from burrowing through the embankment and creating a 50-foot high weakness. News sources also said this wasn’t the first sign of problems; a 1996 flood swamped 60 homes in an eerily-similar fashion. Given that the evidence seemed so stacked against TCID, the real question is why the class-action suit was only settled with an $18.1-million payment in April 2016, eight long years after the incident.
Understanding the Fernley Suit
TCID, the city of Fernley and Lyon County were sued over their negligent management soon after the incident. Fernley, the county and insurance companies paid around 600 victims a total of $10 million dollars in 2012.
TCID, however, balked at paying. Why was this possible? A judge may have opened the gates with his original decree that the U.S. Justice Department take part in the settlement negotiations.
Although USBR actually owned the canal, federal lawyers resisted getting involved. In addition to maintaining that TCID’s management made it responsible, the Justice Department expressed concern with TCID’s plan to fund settlement payments using USBR-owned property as collateral. Knowing their proposition was off the table, the TCID board didn’t sign the initial agreement. Eventually, the judge was forced to retract his decision and admit the ruling was incomplete.
Key Takeaways
At no point during the proceedings was it unclear that TCID was primarily responsible. The fact that USBR had even warned the board of potential problems in advance may have given the government the grounds it needed to distance itself from the matter. If there’s anything to learn from this, it’s that the structure of a lawsuit and who it targets have just as much of an impact on its resolution as factors like who was actually at fault or the amount the plaintiffs request.
In the lawsuit filed in federal court, Linda Anne Bond claims both parties sued are guilty of “deliberately indifferent treatment of a prisoner” and negligence. According to Betty Bernt, a representative of the Oregon Department of Corrections, the department is unable to make any comments on the pending litigation.
Haynes-Bordas did keep in contact with her employers throughout her recovery, and tried to make arrangements for how she would manage to return to work. She had asked for a modified bathroom to make it easier for her to maneuver with her wheelchair, and states she was told by the building manager that it would be an easy fix. She believes this request may have caused her termination. Haynes had been teaching low-income families in the area how best to handle their money, and had been on an award-winning team recognized for their effectiveness in helping develop community skills.
The suit, which names ABC, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and doctor Sebastian Schubl, alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy for the 2011 recording and 2012 airing of Mark Chanko’s death for the ABC television show “NY Med.” Although Chanko’s face was blurred out and his name never mentioned, his widow alleged intense emotional pain as a result of accidentally seeing the broadcast. Moreover, neither ABC nor the hospital ever received permission from the dying man to record or broadcast his death.
Walk Apartments in New Castle. Company spokespersons were unavailable for comment.
Ironically, the agency is credited with having hired the first female copywriter in the industry, Helen Lansdowne Resor, who later went on to become a creative director. Johnson began working for the company in 2005, and said that after Martinez took over in 2015, she found it “virtually impossible” to present the agency in a positive light due to his behavior. Other 
According to advertisements and promotions, the Electrolux ice maker is able to offer “ice at your fingertips” to consumers. However, these 100,000 members claimed that the product failed to produce ice as marketed and instead caused major damage to their refrigerators. Many of the members reported that the product leaked only a few months after they purchased it.
The lawsuit accuses the Golden Living Center of negligence in hiring, training, and supervising Jones, failing to maintain the well-being of the victim, and failure to promote quality of life for the victim. A spokesperson for the facility stated that background checks are run on employees. However, these checks do not always account for unpredictable behavior following employment.