Archive for News – Page 35

Tribe Sues Seattle Over Salmon Depletion

An alleged abuse of local salmons’ right to exist and flourish has the city of Seattle defending its hydroelectric energy supply in state and tribal courts.

The Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe in a Saugk-Suiattle Tribal Court filing named Seattle as the sole defendant. The tribe says that the city’s three hydroelectric dams are killing off local salmon and negatively affecting the tribe’s cultural practices and traditions.

The tribe also says it filed the tribal lawsuit on behalf of the salmon. That makes salmon co-plaintiffs in the filing, which, refers to the salmon as Tsuladx in the tribe’s native language.

The tribe in its recently filed tribal court lawsuit says the salmon have natural rights to live and thrive, which the city of Seattle is violating. So the tribe filed the lawsuit on behalf of itself and the salmon.

Seattle owns three hydroelectric dams on the river. The tribe says that the dams were not constructed in a manner that enables the salmon to bypass the dams and continue their annual spawning migrations.

The Sauk-Suiattle tribe says the three dams do not allow passage of the salmon during annual spawning runs. And that is killing off the local fishery in the Skagit River.

The dams cited are the Diablo, Gorge, and Ross dams that comprise the Skagit River Hydroelectric Project in the northwest region of Washington State. The dams are located about 100 miles from Seattle and account for about 20 percent of the city’s electrical power.

The public utility Seattle City Light operates the three dams that are located along an eight-mile section of the Skagit River. The dams are situated within the Cascade Mountains and affect more than a third of the Skagit River watershed.

Salmon, trout, and steelhead live and spawn in those waters. The tribe says their numbers are much lower due to the dams and are negatively affecting tribal culture and practices. It also is violating the salmon’s natural right to live and thrive.

The tribal court lawsuit is in addition to one recently filed in King County Superior Court. Seattle has filed a counter lawsuit that seeks dismissal of the state and tribal suits. A federal court last year dismissed a similar lawsuit filed by the tribe against the city.

Four Reasons to Call a Personal Injury Attorney

There are many incidents that can occur that will cause you to suffer a personal injury, but when is it necessary for you to enlist the help, guidance, and assistance of a personal injury attorney? Read on to discover the top four reasons you may need to call a personal injury attorney for legal assistance.

 

Auto Accidents

Auto accidents are the most common incidents in which you may suffer a personal injury. Many times, an auto accident will result in serious injury to you or your passengers. If you are a loved one has suffered an injury that has caused you to miss work, lose wages, or other issues, you will want to enlist the assistance of a personal injury attorney to hold the other party accountable for their actions as well as your medical bills and other expenses.

 

Medical Negligence

Medical negligence can occur if a physician, nurse, or other medical professional makes a mistake that causes you to suffer a personal injury. It is important to consult a personal injury lawyer right away if you have suffered any type of personal injury due to medical malpractice or negligence.

 

Public Liability Cases

From slip and fall incidents to an incident caused by a restaurant, store, or company’s negligence, public liability cases are more common than you think. For instance, if you are walking into a grocery store and slip and fall on the wet floor and there was no warning sign that the floor was wet, the grocery store may very well be responsible for paying for your medical bills and any lost wages from missing work. In this case, it is extremely important to contact a personal injury attorney who can gather evidence to determine who is at fault.

 

Victim of Crime

If you become the victim of a crime, from a domestic violence incident to a burglary or any other crime, not only will you want to file charges against the perpetrator through your local prosecutor’s office, but you may very well want to consult a personal injury attorney. Your personal injury attorney will help you receive compensation for medical bills that you incur as well as an array of other things.

Washington State Attorney General Files Lawsuits on Behalf of Duped Small Businesses

SEATTLE – Consumer protection lawsuits have been filed against two companies that sent deceptive letters to small business owners throughout the state of Washington.

According to Attorney General Bob Ferguson, 210,000 deceptive letters were sent out to small business owners, demanding payment for a “Certificate of Status” or a poster for the workplace that can be obtained from the Washington State government free of charge. More than 15,000 business owners paid the two defendants, CA Certificate Service, which also does business as WA Certificate Service, and Labor Poster Compliance, more than $1.2 million.

The lawsuits specifically name the owners of the two companies, including CA Certificate Service owners James L. Beard, Dean G. Marshlack, Chad M. Davis and Joshua T. Strawn. Beard and Davis are also named in the suits as the co-owners of Labor Poster Compliance. The companies operate throughout the United States but are based in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Ferguson said that the two companies have sent out at least 210,784 letters since March of 2019 to dupe business owners into making unnecessary payments to both of the companies. According to the Attorney General’s Office, about 14,783 small business owners shelled out $82.50 each to CA Certificate Service for a whopping total of $1.2 million and over $25,000 at a rate of $79.25 to Labor Poster Compliance with 318 Washington business owners paying the unnecessary fee.

Ferguson said the letters the two companies mailed to business owners were created to look official and to be legitimate. Some business owners attempted to have their money refunded when they realized the companies were misleading them but did not receive any responses or refunds.

Ferguson’s office continues to receive complaints as more business owners come forward who have been duped by the two companies. He is asking the court to require both companies to pay back the money they took from business owners throughout the state, along with civil penalties, attorney fees and court costs. He has cited several other cases that are similar in nature in which small business owners were successful in winning the lawsuits that were filed. He is hopeful to garner the same success for the duped small business owners from his own state.

Questions about whether Mark Zuckerburg will have to Answer Questions under Oath

Facebook has spent a lot of time in the spotlight recently, and the Attorney General’s office in Washington DC is arguing that the CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, should be forced to answer questions related to Facebook’s privacy laws.

A lawsuit was filed against Facebook by the city in 2018. Since that time, Facebook has rebranded itself to Meta Platforms, but the lawsuit remains. According to recent filings related to the lawsuit, Facebook has not taken adequate steps to provide Zuckerberg for deposition even though a District of Columbia Superior Court judge has allowed for Zuckerburg to be questioned pursuant to an order issued on January 10th.

In contrast, lawyers for Zuckerburg have asked the judge to block Zuckerberg’s deposition. The request was filed on the first of February, and it claims that he has no unique information to offer. The request further alleges that the deposition is a transparent attempt to harass the CEO.

Ultimately, this latest battle in the lawsuit is a representation of the greater issue that the lawsuit addresses. Currently, there is an “apex doctrine” in place, which states that high-level executives could be shielded from certain elements of a lawsuit if they did not have direct control of the information directly addressed in the lawsuit. It appears that Zuckerburg’s lawyers are trying to use this very doctrine in an effort to save him from having to answer questions under oath.

The original element of the lawsuit accuses Facebook, which now goes by the name Meta, of misleading its users about who had access to certain pieces of personal data. In 2018, the popular technology company came under fire because a consulting firm based in the United Kingdom, Cambridge Analytica, deceived consumers about the information that it was collecting from the users on the social network.

Attorneys representing Washington DC state that they want to talk to Mark Zuckerberg to learn more about what he knew about the actions taken by Cambridge Analytica, steps the company takes to figure out what its partners and users are doing, and what actions (or inaction) the company took to prevent information of its private users from being stolen. It will be interesting to see if Mark Zuckerberg ever has to answer questions under oath.

Easterday CFTC Cattle Fraud Lawsuit Case

Cody Allen Easterday might have a bit of room to breathe for a bit. Unlike what the Commodity Future’s Trading Corporation (CFTC) would prefer, Mr. Easterday will enjoy a respite from his civil litigation with the Corporation; the federal bankruptcy court effectively stopped any further action of the lawsuit pending Mr. Easterday’s current bankruptcy filing deliberation.

If Mr. Easterday’s name is unfamiliar, it becomes particularly notorious again in terms of association with the defrauding of Tyson Foods to the tune of $244 million. In that fraud case, which Mr. Easterday has pled guilty to, Tyson Foods was duped out of almost a quarter billion dollars for cattle care that never was provided because the cattle never existed. With regards to that criminal action, Mr. Easterday is facing up to 20 years in federal prison. However, that related sentencing is delayed pending the finalization of his Chapter 11 bankruptcy or May 10, 2022.

The CFTC had lined up among a handful of federal agencies, pursuing recovery from Mr. Easterday for his criminal activity, with the CFTC filing being late to the party and filed only a year prior, in March 2021. In that regard, the court determined that Mr. Easterday would be subject to a $30 million penalty for fraudulent securities activities and similar, in addition to his already existing restitution expected to Tyson Foods. The basis of the CFTC case hinged on Easterday racking up over $200 million in losing market cattle futures trades. That market pitfall, in turn, was the driver for Easterday’s fraudulent invoices to cover the losses.

Easterday positioned himself as a major cattle market player through to organizations, Easterday Farms and Easterday Ranches. Easterday purposefully misrepresented his values in his trades, stating he had more than sufficient cattle inventory to back his trades, particularly in the area of revenue from cattle sales. He did in fact have a real family operation in farming, but Easterday fabricated the buying of cattle and then feeding them, invoicing Tyson for the cost. Amazingly, the company paid the invoices without asking why.

In the bankruptcy liquidation, the bulk of Easterday’s holding will go to a holding company for the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-day Saints, auctioned off in June 2021. Among somewhere between 200 and almost 1,000 creditors, Tyson is at the top of the list arguing for some kind of recovery from Easterday’s holdings in bankruptcy. It’s a sad, cold ending for a family farm business started in 1958 and ruined by the market gambling of one person.

Lawsuit Filed Against Seattle Hospital in Data Breach

Patient privacy laws have been a significant area of focus during the past few years, and the latest data breach impacted Sea Mar Community Health Centers, which is based in Seattle. In 2021, the hospital was hit by a data breach that impacted close to 700,000 patients. Now, the popular hospital system is facing a potential class-action lawsuit related to its handling of that specific data breach.

Allegations made in the lawsuit against Sea Mar Community Health Centers claim that the health system was negligent in its inability to protect its patients from having their private information stolen.

Sea Mar Community Health Centers discovered the data breach in June 2021. Professionals working for the hospital system determined that criminals had accessed the data center between December 2020 and March 2021, proceeding to copy all of the data they came across. A lot of criminals like to steal information from hospitals because hospitals collect personal information including bank account numbers, credit card numbers, phone numbers, social security numbers, birthdays, addresses, and other examples of sensitive information they might use to commit identity theft.

HIPAA, which is the main patient privacy Law, requires all Hospital Systems, including Sea Mar Community Health Centers, to notify any victims of a data breach within 60 days of what happened. According to the lawsuit, Sea Mar Community Health Centers failed to meet that standard. Some patients had to wait 10 months after the data breach to hear that their personal information had been stolen.

Furthermore, the lawsuit against Sea Mar Community Health Centers seeks to shed more light on the data breach. The plaintiffs want to know what information was stolen, how they were able to access this information, and what the impacts of this theft might be. The lawsuit also alleges that if the hospital system had better safeguards and data protection in place, including proper encryption, all of this could have been avoided.

It will be interesting to see what type of impact this has on hospital systems, which are supposed to follow all regulations in HIPAA. The Sea Mar Community Health Centers data breach has impacted hundreds of thousands of people who are concerned that criminals might use their information for nefarious purposes.

Another Lawsuit Filed Against Tesla Alleges Racial Discrimination in the Workplace

Tesla has been in the news a lot recently. Recent allegations of racism have been made against the popular electric vehicle manufacturer. In the lawsuit, Marc Cage, who is of African American descent, claims that he was fired for reporting widespread safety violations. Even though reporting widespread safety violations should be enough for some form of protection, he further alleged that he was fired due to issues relating to his race.

In the lawsuit, Cage claims that he reported these safety issues because he was concerned that the conditions of Tesla’s battery factory in Nevada left certain components at risk of exploding, placing countless people at serious risk of injury or death. Furthermore, the lawsuit alleges that there were systemic failures by the company to disclose major risks that led to on-the-job injuries.

The lawsuit also alleges that Tesla maintains commitments to unrealistic production goals. As a result, employees try to work as fast as they can but often lead to mistakes. These mistakes can lead to serious manufacturing concerns, injuries among its workers, and promises that have to be broken. He further alleges that other employees at Tesla, including managers of the company, harassed him on the basis of his race. He further alleges that leadership at Tesla did not do enough to protect him against this form of discrimination.

As an example, he claims that just about every restroom and the Tesla facility in Fremont contained racist slurs, swastikas, and even uses of the n-word. While Tesla has not yet commented on the lawsuit, the allegations made by Cage against the popular electric vehicle company are alarming.

Furthermore, it is not the first lawsuit to be filed against Tesla due to issues related to racism. Recently, a state agency in California filed a lawsuit against Tesla on behalf of African-American workers who claimed they were subjected to drawings and racist slurs at the very same facility. Even though Tesla has said that that lawsuit is misguided, there are other allegations of racism being made against Tesla as well. It will be interesting to see where this most recent lawsuit goes and if it forces Tesla to make any changes.

Daycare Center Hit With Lawsuit Related to Injuries From Rope Swing

When parents send their children to preschool, they expect them to be properly protected. Unfortunately, children suffer injuries from time to time, but when these injuries stem from negligence, responsible parties need to be held accountable. That is the basis of a recent lawsuit filed against the Children’s Learning Center. Recently, a lawsuit was filed related to an incident that occurred in 2019. A child was playing at the Rafter J campus location when a rope swing, which was placed above a paved surface, led to injuries.

The executive director of the Children’s Learning Center simply stated that the center does everything it can to make sure every child remains safe but did not comment directly on the lawsuit. The parents of the child who suffered these injuries are seeking damages. The lawsuit states that the daycare center should have known that the child could have fallen off the rope swing and suffered serious injuries, particularly because the rope swing was hanging over a paved surface. The lawsuit further alleges that the center did not follow all reasonable Child Care safety standards.

In the lawsuit, the parents also claimed that they were not aware that the center allows their children to swing on a rope swing above a paved surface prior to enrolling their child at the daycare center.

On the date of the incident, the child was swinging on the rope swing under the supervision of teachers at the daycare center, according to the information in the lawsuit. Then, at some time while the child was swinging on the rope swing, he fell from the swing head first. As a result, he struck his head on the ground, suffering a fractured skull, a traumatic brain injury, numerous lacerations, and a fracture in the left wrist.

The parents are seeking damages to cover the cost of medical expenses, a loss of earning capacity related to the injuries, and potential compensation for future disabilities the child may develop as a result of the injuries.

It is important for children to be kept safe while they are at daycare. Only time will tell to see if the daycare center is held responsible for the injuries sustained by this child in the accident.

How to Build a Strong Personal Injury Case

How to Build a Strong Personal Injury Case

You might be victimized in a car accident, while shopping in a grocery store, or in some other way that caused you to suffer a personal injury. If so, some basic steps can help you to build a strong case against liable parties. It starts with avoiding posting to social media, unless you are simply proclaiming your injuries and how badly you feel.

Four Elements of a Solid Personal Injury Claim

You have to prove four elements to file a successful personal injury claim with an insurer or in court. You have to prove that a dangerous condition existed or that the offending party acted negligently. You have to prove the offending party should have known about a dangerous condition or known that it was acting negligently while driving or doing something else that caused an accident.

You also have to prove that the dangerous condition or negligent act caused you harm. And you have to show the harm caused by damage, such as personal injury, property damage, or both.

Obtain Medical Treatment

Medical treatment is a must for any personal injury case. It is the best way to get a professional medical diagnosis that affirms harm occurred. It also shows the extent of the harm caused and affixes a cost for treating the personal injury. The sooner you get medical treatment, the more valid your personal injury claims become.

Gather All Available Evidence

You need to take photos of dangerous conditions or accident scenes following a mishap that caused your personal injury. If any witnesses are available, you should try to obtain their contact information and ensure their testimony would support your claim. Photos, witness statements, and other evidence could confirm another party caused the accident.

Retain an Attorney

You need to retain an experienced personal injury attorney. Your attorney can help you to present a strong case. The attorney also stops insurers, other attorneys, and bill collectors from contacting you while the case is active. All communication must go through your attorney until the case has concluded in your favor.

Avoiding Mistakes in Personal Injury Lawsuits

According to the CDC, there are over 39 million people injured in the United States every single year. With such high numbers, chances are you might one day fall victim to a personal injury. There are several steps you can take to ensure you get the best settlement after a personal injury, and avoid making common mistakes that can cause you to forfeit a larger settlement.

Keep Track Of All Injuries

When you argue your case in front of a judge or jury, they will want to see why a settlement is justified for your pain and suffering. Many people make the mistake of not taking the time and working after their injury. They might also continue to complete day to day activities in an effort to hide their injuries and move past them.

Unfortunately, not taking the time to document your injuries and heal from them can give the impression that your injuries were not serious. On the contrary, even simple injuries such as slips and falls can lead to negative consequences. It’s best to not hide or mask your injuries, and instead, document them through doctor’s visits, journals, and at work.

Know Your Rights

It’s important to understand your rights after an injury. If the injury is the fault of someone else, including your work place, you are entitled to a proper settlement to pay for your pain and suffering and future medical expenses. Many insurance companies will pretend they are on your side, however, they are always fighting to keep their pockets full. Insurance companies offer low settlements in an effort to make you settle out of court and not continue to fight for your rights. Never settle for a first offer, and always seek to take cases to trial if the insurance company continues to be unfair.

Get Professional Help

In addition to properly documenting your injuries and taking the time to heal, it’s also best to get professional help. A dedicated personal injury lawyer can walk you through the entire settlement process. From filing your claim in court in a timely manner, to not accepting the first settlement, and helping gather evidence for your claim, a lawyer will argue on your behalf.