Archive for News – Page 56

Former Sports Anchor, Vince Lennon sues Alabama TV Station for Claims of Racial Discrimination

When it comes to breach of contract and racial discrimination in the workplace, no employee can tolerate such behavior from their employers. Employees who have gone through this have been forced to acquire the help of the law to right the wrongs the employers have put them through. One employee looking for justice because of the breach of contract and racial discrimination comments, he went through at his workplace. This employee is none other than a former Montgomery TV sports anchor Vince Lennon. He filed a suit against Montgomery Television on three accounts of fraud, racial discrimination, and breach of contract.

He claims that while working at the network, he did not have the same treatment compared to his white co-workers. The reason for the difference in treatment was that he is of Spanish descent. Vince Lennon also claimed that the network lied to him in terms of the details of his employment while he was being recruited for his sports anchoring position at WAKA.

According to Lennon, when he left his stable job at Tennessee and relocated to Montgomery, he succumbed to economic hardship and financial loss. The loss he experienced continued after the company failed to pay his salary, as stipulated in his contract. WAKA also failed to pay him the makeup allowance they agreed upon when signing his contract.

Also, according to lawsuit Vince Lennon filed, when he was being “lured” away from Chattanooga to Montgomery to work at WAKA, Halbrooks promised a fully staffed bureau for production and editing of sports segments along with multiple cameras. But upon accepting the job, Lennon did not receive any of the promises. His department was not fully staffed, and he never did receive the equipment promised by management. During the one year he worked at WAKA, he never got any of the promises or agreements they made before signing the contract.

The lawsuit also includes several claims of harassment from his co-worker Sanders, especially one that claims his co-worker insinuated that he would cut off Vince Lennon’s manhood. The case is still pending, but most of his lawsuit claims have been ruled out due to jurisdictional issues.

Mother’s Lawsuit Claims South Carolina Guards Left Son to Die in Prison Yard

Allen Capers, 32, died on December 31, 2017, at the Turbeville Correctional Institution in South Carolina after receiving multiple stab wounds to the head, neck stomach, and hand. Renegade inmates had overpowered a guard, taken the master keys, attacked Capers as well as at least eight other inmates. They were using makeshift shanks, fire extinguishers, parts of chairs, a broken piece of metal, and mattresses as weapons in the assaults.

His mother, Debra Capers Dickson, filed a lawsuit claiming that the South Carolina Department of Corrections left Capers in the prison yard to die. By their negligence in providing adequate security and medical care, the SCDC contributed to the death of Allen Capers, according to the lawsuit.

Background: Prison Violence

The rash of prison violence has been widely reported and investigated. With severe understaffing, attempts to stem and prevent the violence and mounting homicide rate has been unsuccessful. The events on New Year’s Eve 2017 were part of just another outbreak of prison. As Justin Bamberg, the state representative and the attorney representing the family, says, “We’re talking about years, years of critical neglect from the state of South Carolina, years of problems with staffing, years of problems with facilities.”

Case Study for Prison Reform

A surveillance video depicts the prison guards dragging Capers out into the prison yard, and walking up to him, but not providing any medical intervention or assistance. While a statement from the SCDC claims that the actions of the guards are under investigation, Bamberg is pushing to make this a case study in the prison reform movement. He is calling for a capital-improvement bond to fix safety and security issues at the SCDC, which would have likely protected Capers.

The promise of greater security, combined with compensatory provisions, could also fix the understaffing issue. The rash of violence in the prison system has not only affected the lives of the inmates, but the guards are in danger as well. So, prison reform means improving the environment and working conditions for both inmates and guards. True improvement must take both sides of the cell-block door into consideration. It should not be a death sentence to serve out time in prison, according to Debra Capers.

Medical Malpractice As A Result Of “Never Events” Errors

Over eight years of analysis, John Hopkins’ patient safety experts, reported, in 2016, that medical errors are the third highest cause of death in the United States of over 250,00 deaths per year. Because of the high expectation of performance, “physician burnout” was said to be the cause of medical errors. Physician burnout occurs in more than 54% of physicians. The emotional symptoms of “burnout” are due to exhaustion, the dehumanizing viewing of patients as objects, and the accompanying cynicism.

A study of the relationship between the nurse’s burdensome amount of work and patient deaths found that an increase in one surgical patient led to a seven percent increase in the likelihood that a patient would die within the first thirty days of admission. The most damaging errors that a physician can engage in are errors referred to as “never events.” “Never events” are errors made by physicians that should “never, ever occur.” Research has shown that ” never events,” between September 1990 and September 2010, accounted for 9,744 paid malpractice claims. One half these claims were the result of surgery using the wrong procedure or the wrong part of the body and only 17 claims were the result of an operation on the wrong person.

Some of the more noted “never events” have been published in the media. In early April 2019, an Iowa jury awarded to Rickie Huitt $12.25 million because his prostate gland was removed, which was misdiagnosed as having cancer. His pathologist was treating two patients in 2017 and mixed up their slides containing tissue samples. The hospital’s anatomical laboratory mixed Mr. Huitt samples with another person who was diagnosed as having prostate cancer.

The mistake led to an incorrect diagnosis which directly resulted in his prostate gland being removed. The operation also damaged nearby nerves. Mr. Huitt became impotent and incontinent. He felt that he lost his manhood and active sexual relations with his wife due to the side effects of the surgery, which included stress and humiliation.

How could a highly intelligent surgeon and pathologist commit this grievous error? The surgeon/pathologist admitted to her errors of unnecessary surgery and cancer misdiagnosis, which can best be described as a “never event” and possibly the tragic result of “physician burnout.”

No Penalty Charges for Disney

In July 2018, Mr. Juan Alberto Ojeda, 33, a mechanic of Kissimmee, Florida was working in the backstage vehicle maintenance area of the Disney’s Caribbean Beach Resort. He was attempting to repair a utility cart that had been reported for not starting up. For four years, Juan gained knowledge about his job, in an apprenticeship program offered at Disney. After finishing the course, he advanced to the position of a journeyman.

After inspecting the cart, Ojeda realized its battery needed charging, so he placed jumper cables on the power unit and the engine started. He reached into the front of the utility cart and at that moment; the vehicle jumped the curb. According to eyewitnesses, after the vehicle landed on the curb, it proceeded to travel about 3 to 6 feet up a chain-linked fence before falling on the victim, pinning him to the ground.

His fellow workers, Danny Vazquez and Josh Willner rushed over to help Juan, by trying to lift the cart off his body, but it was too heavy. For a brief moment, they thought about reversing the vehicle off him; however, they felt that would do even more damage. Ojeda stated he was having trouble breathing before losing consciousness. He died at the scene.

Juan Ojeda left behind his wife, Leslie and his young son.

The Investigation

After this horrific incident, Leslie Ojeda hired James Provencher, an Orlando attorney that represented the family. In the meantime, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an investigation. This agency is under the umbrella of The Department of Labor in Washington D.C. and was established and signed into law under the presidency of Richard Nixon.

OSHA’s goal is to make sure the workplace has stringent standards in place for the health and safety of employees in the United States. Since its creation in the 1970s, health hazards, illnesses, and overall fatalities have diminished by more than half.

After investigating the casualty involving Juan Ojeda, OSHA determined in an edited 250-page report, that in the future Disney is required to train their workers, making sure that they follow the guidelines in the utility cart’s manufacturer manual. According to Disney’s service manager, Ronald Ehmer, manufacturer’s manuals were in their mechanic’s shop, but it was not mandatory for the workers to use them.

The agency also noted that Ojeda had not used precaution, such as a block and tackle or jacks when dealing with the runaway vehicle. In the end, Walt Disney World was not fined or cited because OSHA felt it was not their fault, they had not breached any safety rules.

No Amends

Mrs. Leslie Ojeda and her attorney then filed a 15,000 dollar wrongful death lawsuit against the companies, Toro Co. and Wesco Turf, the manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of the utility vehicle, stating that the cart was defective and dangerous. They have yet to respond.

Disney – We Need Compensations!

Recently, two lawsuits were filed against Walt Disney World concerning their PeopleMover ride. This transit system takes people on a 10-minute narrated tour of Tomorrowland’s attractions located in the Magic Kingdom.

The first mishap involves The Tregidgo family of New Jersey. In 2015, John and Heather Tregidgo and their two children were in Florida on vacation. They were enjoying the view as their cart slowly moved along. All of a sudden the ride stopped, which resulted in the cart behind them to ram into theirs, causing serious injuries to Heather.

The second event affected the claimant, Kristie Deieso. In 2017, she visited Orlando from New York to have fun on a female-focused vacation. The PeopleMover transport started pulling forward on the rails and then came to a halt about 100 yards from the station. A trailing tram cart collided with the one Kristie was in. Even though the maximum speed of the ride is 7 mph, it still resulted in trauma to her body.

The Damages

The Tregidgo family hired attorney Robert Hemphill, who is collaborating with another advocate, Barry Novack of California. The lawsuit states that the PeopleMover ride is hazardous and a hidden trap, which contributed to Heather requiring two orthopedic surgeries exceeding 175,000 dollars.

Kristie also contacted legal representative, Brian Wilson after experiencing neck and shoulder discomfort. Later on, she needed to have an operation for a ruptured disc in her neck due to the accident at Disney World. Her lawsuit mentioned that her impairment is probably permanent and that it is a strong possibility she might continue to have health issues in the future.

Both Heather and Kristie are seeking more than 15,000 dollars in compensation for their pain and suffering.

It Has Happened Before

These two cases were not the only lawsuits against Disney because of the mechanical issues surrounding the PeopleMover transit system. In 2015, two sisters were riding the tram with a couple of kids, when the carts smashed into each other. This occurrence ended in them being severely injured. In July 2017, the case was closed after a concealed settlement was attained.

As both lawyers, Hemphill and Wilson proceed with their lawsuits, they wonder if Walt Disney World has fixed PeopleMover in light of the past-alleged events.

Whistleblower Gets Fired, Sues City

In East Lansing, Michigan, a former city water treatment employee alleges to have been fired for alerting the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality about potentially hazardous conditions at the East Lansing water treatment center.

Troy Williams was fired last year on December 31st. City officials claim he was fired due to restrictions making him unable to perform his job, while Williams contends that it was retaliation for his whistleblowing activities. Williams had been a pump mechanic specialist with the city for nearly 10 years before being fired in 2018. Manda Denieleski, the lawyer representing Williams, remarked that the case sends an important message of solitary to future whistleblowers.

According to the lawsuit, Williams is claiming protected status as a whistleblower. Williams says that he made multiple reports to the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality over the years about hazards at the facility. He also alleges that the city threatened to fire him when he brought his concerns to their attention.

Williams is also involved in a preexisting lawsuit from 2015 that alleges the city of East Lansing covered up a 2007 study that found asbestos in the facility and that the city mishandled a 2013 mercury spill that endangered workers. Echoing the earlier threat, several employees have come forward saying the city told them to keep quiet about the asbestos report. East Lansing has been fined twice for asbestos and mercury-related problems. The first time for violating safety standards pertaining to asbestos and mercury and the second time for failing to correct the problems outlined in the first fine.

Williams is hoping to see a financial win from the city that will recover his lost wages and non-economic damages he has sustained—including health problems he alleges are connected to asbestos exposure. He also hopes to recoup the legal fees relating to his case. His lawyer commented that such fees can become quite high in these types of cases. Williams and his lawyer have hired the services of an economics expert to help better calculate the damages.

Londonderry Woman Sues Stumble Inn for Negligence in Trip and Fall Accident

A Londonderry woman who tripped and fell at the Stumble Inn three years ago has filed a lawsuit in the Rockingham County Superior Court against the bar and grille and its landlord, the B-Saini Group LLC.

According to the court documents, the plaintiff, Brittany Pescia, visited the Stumble Inn on April 8, 2016, at around 9 p.m. Pescia was walking towards the entrance just as two unnamed men were exiting. The suit alleges the men were engaged in a fight at the time of the incident.

Pescia alleges the Stumble Inn’s entrance was too narrow and did not allow Pescia and the two skirmishing men to simultaneously enter and exit. So as Pescia got closer, she was pushed, lost her balance, and fell to the ground.

The court documents allege that this fall resulted in Pescia receiving a cerebral concussion, mild traumatic brain injury, a spinal injury, and suffering long-term post-concussion syndrome. These injuries also forced Pescia to take time away from work and resulted in her losing a significant portion of wages.

The fall and the resulting injuries, the suit alleges, were largely caused by the bar’s negligence to fail and provide a proper entrance and exit area. The lawsuit alleges the bar and landlord failed to provide an adequate warning with signs alerting customers of the ”hazardous condition” via visual cues. The suit continues to allege they were likewise negligent in their failure to construct or provide a ramp and/or handrails in the area that she fell and was hurt and that such a failure to do so violates building and safety codes and standards.

The suit continues to allege that the bar, which had prominent signage declaring “Soup of the day is whiskey” was negligent in allegedly serving alcohol to a “person or persons who were intoxicated and/or showed signs of intoxication normally associated with the consumption of alchoholic beverages.”

Pescia filed this suit thorough Derry attorney Andrew D. Myers. It seeks a jury trial and does not list a specified amount of damages. The bar and its landlord group have not yet filed a response to the suit nor have they made a public statement refuting the aforementioned allegations.

Medical Mistakes Ruin Lives

In April 2017, Rickie and Judy Huitt were at The Iowa Clinic, located in Des Moines, where Rickie was scheduled for an operation. Earlier that year, the retired John Deere factory worker had been diagnosed with prostate cancer that required surgery. Dr. Joy Trueblood, one of the pathologists at the clinic, performed the procedure, removing his prostate gland. However, after another pathologist inspected the purportedly affected gland, it was determined the organ was never cancerous.

What Happened?

It seems as though Dr. Trueblood confused tissue sample slides from another male patient, that had cancer and attributed them to Mr. Huitt. The outcome of the surgery caused local nerve damage to the area, which resulted in incontinence and erectile dysfunction. It is difficult to comprehend the emotions the couple experienced after discovering the truth about this unnecessary treatment.

Unfortunately, this happens more than people could imagine. According to a study released in 2016 by Johns Hopkins, more than 250,000 cases of medical errors are the cause of death in the United States. Although Rickie Huitt survived, the wrong action taken by the physician made a devastating impact on him and his wife’s life.

Proper Compensation…

The couple filed a suit against The Iowa Clinic and Dr. Trueblood, seeking 15 million dollars in damages; however, Jack Hilmes, the attorney representing the clinic suggested that the sum of money awarded should be only $750,000. He stated that Rickie was 67 years old and although the operation he had was not required, he could still perform activities, such as mowing the yard and driving a vehicle to pick up his grandkids from school.

When Mrs. Huitt took the stand, she tearfully stated that the love life they had before had diminished and because of involuntary urination, he has to use several urine-absorbent pads every day. In addition, she felt their lives would never be complete again because of this major error by the medical community.

Nick Rowley, a famous malpractice suit lawyer, was the leader of the four-member team of attorneys The Huitts had hired to present their case in court. In his closing argument, Mr. Huitt told the jury that Rickie had lost his manhood and it could not be restored. They deserved the amount for which they were asking.

In the end, the Polk County jury awarded Rickie and Judy Huitt 12.25 million dollars.

Parkland Survivors and Their Families File a Variety of Lawsuits

More than a year after the tragic shooting in Parkland, Florida, the lawsuits and other various legal actions filed by the families and survivors have been winding their way through the courts. The most recent step forward occurred in early April of 2019 when 26 families and survivors placed legal actions on the grounds of negligence against the Broward County Sherriff’s Department, Stoneman Douglas High School, and a variety of other defendants. However, their suits will be delayed as the state of Florida and other governmental agencies attempt to work out the complex web of legal liability from the tragic event.

A compensation fund for the victims was originally discussed, but it appears to have lost momentum in the Florida legislature. The current legislative session comes to an end on May 3rd, and it is extremely unlikely that the fund will be discussed and passed in the time remaining. Lawyers for the victims and school board officials are casting blame over the failure of the compensation bill to pass, while legislators point to the already overloaded schedule and the issues involved in taxpayer compensation for the tragedy.

Meanwhile, the Florida Supreme Court is examining the question of whether the Parkland shooting should be considered, from the legal point of view, as one large shooting or as a series of small ones. This is a critical distinction, as the insurance companies would pay the survivors and their families approximately eleven times more compensation if it is seen as a number of individual shootings. The Florida Supreme Court’s decision will likely be foundational to all subsequent suits and challenges.

The coming lawsuits represent the survivors of ten individuals who were murdered on February 14, 2018, and twelve survivors who sustained physical wounds. Some legal actions cover more than one victim, while others represent groups. The Stoneman Douglas school has retained a lobbying firm to advocate for the taxpayer-funded victims’ fund, and they claim that their actions to secure this compensation demonstrate good faith on their part. The $160 million dollar fund, if passed, would provide more compensation than the insurance companies would alone, but in order to draw from it, the plaintiffs would have to agree to drop their legal cases. With the legislature likely to adjourn before passing a bill enacting this fund, the survivors and families face the possibility of another year in legal limbo.

Woman Falls to Her Death After Wandering from Retirement Home

Retirement homes are tasked with providing care, safety, and peace of mind to their residents. Even a minor oversight can lead to tragedy, a fact that the family of 78-year-old Barbara Jones-Davis knows all too well.

On the night of July 8, 2018, Jones-Davis wandered from Wesley Enhanced Living at Stapeley in Germantown, PA never to return. Living with dementia, Jones-Davis had a history of wandering, and her glaucoma made it difficult for her to safely navigate the grounds. Cameras showed her walking unattended for 23 minutes before she fell 15 feet from the unfenced property onto the concrete sidewalk on West Washington Lane. She suffered a skull fracture, bleeding in the brain, and broken bones, ultimately succumbing to her injuries later that night.

Jones-Davis’ daughters, Heather Davis-Stukes and Pamela Davis-Edwards, sued Stapeley on the grounds of negligence and wrongful death. The retirement home expressed their commitment to safety and condolences for Jones-Davis’ family, but could not provide further details on the matter.

Moving to a retirement home was a tough but necessary choice for Jones-Davis. Her daughters worried constantly about her worsening dementia and glaucoma and believed she needed more supervision. Jones-Davis initially refused to move to Stapeley in 2015, but reluctantly accepted in 2017 at her daughters’ behest. The sisters picked Stapeley for its beauty and myriad of activities. They also believed that their mother was becoming too isolated and needed to socialize more.

The suit mentions multiple occasions on which Jones-Davis was found wandering both inside and outside the building. Stapeley caregivers assured her daughters that their mother’s cognition had improved following treatment for a urinary tract infection, opting them to keep her in personal care rather than transferring her to the more monitored memory care. The sisters alleged that the staff knew she needed more supervision, but neglected to provide additional safeguards such as a wander guard, or bands that trigger locks or alarms when worn through a checkpoint.

Daniel Jeck, the lawyer arguing the case, deemed Jones-Davis’ death “totally preventable.” He also affirmed that his clients’ main goal was to understand the exact circumstances that led to their mother’s death and to improve safety at the retirement home.