Archive for News – Page 82

A Wrongful Death Lawsuit Delivers Justice for Grieving Family

A $250,000 judgment  awarded to a woman  in a wrongful death lawsuit relating to her baby’s death at a Topeka, Kansas daycare is being hailed for delivering a measure of justice that the criminal justice system failed to provide. The suit may also bring pressure for criminal charges to be brought in connection with the tragic case.

Mother-uses-civil-court-after-infants-death-mishandledIn 2013, Misty Durham brought her infant son, Caleb Stewart, to his daycare center, operated by Tara Johnson. According to a possibly incomplete police report, Johnson left the center after laying Caleb on a deeply-cushioned surface, rather than a crib. Her friend, Destiny McClusky, was placed in charge. At some point, McClusky realized Caleb wasn’t breathing, and contacted Johnson. Johnson returned with her boyfriend Russell Morris, called 911 and attempted CPR, according to the report. Caleb could not be revived, and was pronounced dead at Stormont Vail Hospital.

Johnson, McClusky, and Morris were named in the wrongful death lawsuit, and the Shawnee County District Court awarded Durham $250,000 — the maximum amount allowed. All three of the named defendants are ordered to pay Durham this amount.

Caleb’s mother has said that the lawsuit was her last resort in a frustrating process that resulted in no criminal charges brought against the three individuals. She alleges that the investigating officer, detective Erin Thompson of the Shawnee County Sheriff’s Office, failed to competently investigate the case. Even more troubling — Thompson may have actually falsified information in her incident report.

The Kansas Bureau of Investigation is currently looking into incidents in which Thompson may have falsified affidavits and mishandled investigations. Durham believes the investigation into Caleb’s death is one of those cases.

In cases such as these, a civil suit brings the only measure of justice currently available to Misty Durham. It is hoped that the police investigation may one day be re-opened and result in criminal charges — largely as a result of Durham’s successful civil suit. For now, Durham can find some measure of peace knowing that the day care operator and her friends have been found responsible for Caleb’s death in the civil court system.

Mother of 5 Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit

On April 26, 2016, Amber Jones, the mother of five children who were brutally murdered by her former husband, Timothy (Tim) Jones, Jr., in late August of 2014, filed a wrongful death suit against the state of South Carolina and the Lexington County Department of Social Services (DSS) for the deaths of her children.

The lawsuit alleges that DSS did not do enough to protect her children: Abigail, 1, Gabriel 2, Nathan, 6, Elias, 7 and Merah, 8, by placing them in their father’s care.  The lawsuit reports that Tim was a “well-documented child abuser” (2) and provides a timeline of reported investigations that began in 2011 following reports of neglect and “substantial risk of physical injury.” (2)  In 2013 and 2014, the children’s school filed reports with DSS; one of which was a report that Tim choked one of the children and threw one against the wall.  A babysitter made a report of abuse in 2014.  DSS reportedly showed negligence in 11 areas and only created safety plans Wrongful-death-lawsuit-5-children-father-Tim-Jones-quotein response to the investigations.

Following the murders in late August 2014, Tim was reported to be under the influence of drugs and believed his children were going “chop him up and feed him to the dogs.” (2)  Tim allegedly strangled the children to death in his home, placed them in plastic bags, put them in his vehicle, and drove around with them for six days prior to dumping their bodies in rural Alabama.  On September 11, 2014, he stopped at a traffic checkpoint in Mississippi and was taken into custody due to blood on the interior and the smell of death coming from the vehicle.  Tim is currently being held in Lexington County, SC where he waits to stand trial for five counts of murder in the deaths of his five children.

The lawsuit states, “Each child suffer[ed] a horrific, but entirely preventable death.” (1)  DSS was reported to be knowledgeable of the risks the children were in from their father and Amber is seeking damages for the “wrongful deaths and conscious pain and suffering of her children.” (2)

 

Lawsuit Alleging Discrimination Widespread at New York Times

The venerable New York Times, one of the nation’s most widely read papers, is facing an unexpected lawsuit from two employees claiming discrimination is widespread at the Times. Two black, female employees in their sixties have filed a federal lawsuit.

Widespread Discrimination

Ernestine Grant and Majorie Walker have filed the lawsuit. Both women work in advertising at the paper. The suit names two people at the times: Chief Revenue Officer Meredith Levien and Chief Executive Mark Thompson. The plaintiffs allege that Thompson actively worked to marginalize the role of women at the Times. The suit further alleges that strong older female voices are not welcome at the paper. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary compensation for the discrimination they claim to have suffered as a result of this belief system.

An Ideal Customer

NYT-quoteThe suit alleges that the paper has both an ideal customer and an ideal client in mind. They assert that the ideal New York Times customer is someone who is younger, at the top end of the pay scale and white. They further allege that the paper also has an ideal employee in mind and this employee is also young, white and in the top percentiles for income. The lawsuit asserts that Times editors do not wish to hire people who do not fit this image. Plaintiffs suggest that those with families who do not meet these criteria have been denied promotional opportunities. They also assert that any company commitment to hiring people of diverse backgrounds has been actively subverted by those in positions of power here.

Denial of These Claims

A spokesperson for the paper vigorously denies all the claims made by both plaintiffs. The spokeswoman asserts that such claims will be fought in court by the company and have no merit at all. Company officials fully expect these claims to be dismissed once the case is heard in court. As the plaintiffs point out, only four of the fourteen members of the paper’s Board of director happen to be female. A single woman has been part of the paper’s ten member of executive committee.

Allstate Lawsuit Still Class Action Despite Supreme Court Ruling Gray Area

In an effort to to avoid facing a class action lawsuit, Allstate attempted to offer a settlement to the named plaintiffs of the case Chen, et al., v. Allstate Ins. Co. To do this they set aside $20,000 dollars in an escrow account and offered a judgment on their part to Richard Chen and Florencio Pacleb, the two who are named for in lawsuit which alleges that Allstate violated consumer rights by sending texts and calls that were unsolicited. The two are seeking $500 in damages for each violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act that Allstate committed to go to all those affected by Allstate’s practices.

9th-circuit-allstate-rulingAllstate’s move is an answer to a Supreme Court case known as Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez, where it was decided that a defendant cannot simply pay off named plaintiffs to avoid a class action lawsuit. There was however a gray area open where it was possible for a defendant to place the monetary settlement in an escrow fund for the named plaintiffs and then enter their own judgment so as to try and avoid the class action portion, and this is what Allstate was attempting to use.

However, the Ninth Circuit Court that presided over this action that Allstate took has decided that the case still remains a class action lawsuit and that the plaintiffs, for the time being at least, can still move ahead with their case. The decision was rendered on April 16th 2016.

Allstate will most likely appeal the judgment all the way to the Supreme Court if they have to, according to the attorneys representing the plaintiffs in the case.

Whereas there had been question before about the hypothetical effect that Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez would have on cases like this, it seems there is a real world example that tests just what the decision means for large entities and those who would bring class action lawsuits against them. Going forward Chen, et al. v. Allstate Ins. Co., looks to define the legacy of the earlier Supreme Court ruling.

Woman claims she was bitten by bed bugs; Sues Albemarle County Super 8 Motel for $5 Million

Janie McFarland and her church group simply wanted to have a peaceful time in Virginia, worshiping at church services and forging connections with other Christians.  McFarland and her group from New York checked into a Super 8 motel in Albermarle County on September 13, 2014. She woke up the next morning to a horrifying sight.

She had “over 40” bites from bed bugs. When she inspected the pillow she had used, she saw spots of blood, a sight those who have suffered through bed bug infestations know all too well. This lead her to inspect the rest of the bed. According to her lawsuit, the bed was covered in bed bugs. She notified hotel management, who she claims were less than cooperative.

Bitten-bed-bug-quote“They were like we don’t know what you’re talking about, we didn’t find any bed bugs, everything is fine,” said McFarland. She claims that the mental and physical trauma, including an allergic reaction to the bites, convinced her to file suit. The alleged callous attitude of the hotel management was another factor. “Other people have probably complained and they didn’t do anything about it,” she said.

The hotel’s owners, Chaxu Incorporated, filed dozens of pages of insect inspection reports as evidence in their favor. A judge, however, recently agreed with McFarland’s claim that these reports do not pertain to bed bugs. Instead, they pertain to ants and other common insects. This ruling allowed the case to move forward.

The next step in the case is a jury trial. The trial is scheduled to last for two days. It will start on July 20th in Charlottesville. The jury will decide if the hotel is liable, and if so, how much they are liable for. The jury’s verdict may be appealed, which is commonplace in lawsuits asking for millions of dollars.

How Did One Nevada Flood Settlement Take Almost a Decade to Award Some Victims?

In January 2008, a canal that was more than 100 years old burst in northern Nevada. The rushing waters sent a two-foot swell coursing through nearby Fernley, much to the dismay and hazard of the small community’s residents. Almost 600 homes were flooded, and their occupants had to be evacuated.

Many who narrowly escaped harm yet lost their properties sued the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District, or TCID. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, or USBR, only needed around two months to determine that TCID failed to prevent vermin from burrowing through the embankment and creating a 50-foot high weakness. News sources also said this wasn’t the first sign of problems; a 1996 flood swamped 60 homes in an eerily-similar fashion. Given that the evidence seemed so stacked against TCID, the real question is why the class-action suit was only settled with an $18.1-million payment in April 2016, eight long years after the incident.

Understanding the Fernley Suit

TCID, the city of Fernley and Lyon County were sued over their negligent management soon after the incident. Fernley, the county and insurance companies paid around 600 victims a total of $10 million dollars in 2012.

TCID, however, balked at paying. Why was this possible? A judge may have opened the gates with his original decree that the U.S. Justice Department take part in the settlement negotiations.

Although USBR actually owned the canal, federal lawyers resisted getting involved. In addition to maintaining that TCID’s management made it responsible, the Justice Department expressed concern with TCID’s plan to fund settlement payments using USBR-owned property as collateral. Knowing their proposition was off the table, the TCID board didn’t sign the initial agreement. Eventually, the judge was forced to retract his decision and admit the ruling was incomplete.

Key Takeaways

At no point during the proceedings was it unclear that TCID was primarily responsible. The fact that USBR had even warned the board of potential problems in advance may have given the government the grounds it needed to distance itself from the matter. If there’s anything to learn from this, it’s that the structure of a lawsuit and who it targets have just as much of an impact on its resolution as factors like who was actually at fault or the amount the plaintiffs request.

 

Coffee Creek Inmate Sues State for Kidney Removal

A female Coffee Creek inmate, aged 62, sued the state of Oregon and the physicians of the Oregon Department of Corrections for medical malpractice. She alleges that the medical staff at the women’s state prison failed to treat her kidney stone properly, which ultimately caused her to lose a kidney.

Linda-Bond-coffee-creekIn the lawsuit filed in federal court, Linda Anne Bond claims both parties sued are guilty of “deliberately indifferent treatment of a prisoner” and negligence. According to Betty Bernt, a representative of the Oregon Department of Corrections, the department is unable to make any comments on the pending litigation.

On December 17, 2013, Bond was transferred to the Coffee Creek Correctional Facility from the Douglas County Jail. In Douglas County, she had begun to feel a sharp pain in her abdomen. According to the suit, the medical staff of the Douglas County jail conducted X-ray images and detected a sizable kidney stone in one of her kidneys. Upon arriving at Coffee Creek, the inmate suffered from severe pain in her abdomen. She also had blood in her urine. Bond alleges that the medical staff provided no treatment besides pain medication.

In the lawsuit, Juan C. Chavez notes that the defendants made no effort to monitor the condition of her kidney or to treat her medical condition. The lawyer also states that the defendants irresponsibly ignored Bond’s pleas for adequate treatment.

Bond began to suffer severe pain that hindered her ability to walk. A correctional officer advocated for her to be examined by a nurse. Doctors found that Bond had developed a severe infection in her left kidney due to the kidney stone. Bond had developed an abscess in her left kidney because the stone blocked its function. She underwent surgery in December 2014 to have the left kidney removed.

In the lawsuit, bond claims that the medical staff of the Oregon Department of Corrections is inadequately trained to handle serious ailments. As of now, Bond remains in custody due to a conviction related to assault and the unlawful use of a weapon.

 

Purdue University Sued for Wrongful Termination by Disabled Employee

Wheelchair-bound Rebecca Haynes-Bordas is suing Purdue for wrongful termination due to her disability. She had been working with the community around West Lafayette, Indiana at Purdue’s extension offices when she needed surgery for her abdominal region. The procedure resulted in her becoming completely paralyzed from the waist down. After that, she was approved by Purdue for leave for up to 2 years (May ’13 – May ’15), but she wasn’t actually able to receive this benefit because she was fired in May of 2014.

purdue-wrongful-terminationHaynes-Bordas did keep in contact with her employers throughout her recovery, and tried to make arrangements for how she would manage to return to work. She had asked for a modified bathroom to make it easier for her to maneuver with her wheelchair, and states she was told by the building manager that it would be an easy fix. She believes this request may have caused her termination. Haynes had been teaching low-income families in the area how best to handle their money, and had been on an award-winning team recognized for their effectiveness in helping develop community skills.

Purdue has not commented on this particular piece of litigation, however Hayne-Bordas stated that she had every intent to come back to work nearly a full year before her total disability leave time ran out. She said she told her boss that she would need about a month to return in May of 2014 when her boss told her that he needed a more concrete date due to her extended absence. Immediately after that conversation, she says she got a letter informing her of her termination. The official reasons were because she had no more paid or unpaid leave available. Her lawsuit filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is contesting that her disability leave lasted until the following year.

After 25 years of employment, Haynes-Bordas is certainly shocked and disillusioned with her employer. Character references from friends and colleagues state that she had earned a stellar reputation for her work, and shouldn’t have been treated this way due to a medical condition that was outside of her control.

Lawsuit Alleging Privacy Violations for Footage of Dying Man Partially Revived

The New York Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that ABC remained not liable in a five million dollar lawsuit brought by the Anita Chanko, the widow of Mark Chanko. Mr. Chanko was struck by a garbage truck in 2011 and rushed to New York-Presbyterian Hospital for emergency treatment, during which he died of a heart attack. The suit turns on ABC’s airing of a recording made of Mr. Chanko’s emergency treatment, which captured doctors discussing amputations and attempting to stem abdominal bleeding before declaring him dead and communicating that news to his family.

NY-law-forbidding-filming-of-patientsThe suit, which names ABC, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and doctor Sebastian Schubl, alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy for the 2011 recording and 2012 airing of Mark Chanko’s death for the ABC television show “NY Med.” Although Chanko’s face was blurred out and his name never mentioned, his widow alleged intense emotional pain as a result of accidentally seeing the broadcast. Moreover, neither ABC nor the hospital ever received permission from the dying man to record or broadcast his death.

The lawsuit had been previously struck down in court, but was partially revived by the appellate decision. Judge Leslie Stein characterized ABC’s actions as unfortunate and unpleasant, even perhaps unintentionally cruel, but not bad enough to meet the legal standard required.  The court nevertheless found that the suit provided enough of a warrant for the breach of confidentiality owed to Chanko by his physician and the hospital for that part of the suit to meet the legal standard. The complaint against Schubl and the hospital will thus go forward.

The family’s attorney, Norman Olch, indicated that the family viewed the appellate ruling as a great victory for patients and for patient rights, as the lawsuit proceeding would send a strong message to hospitals and physicians. Partially as a result of the lawsuit and ensuing controversy the Greater New York Hospital Association has forbidden the filming of patients without their consent for the purposes of entertainment. Queens Democrat and State Assemblyman Ed Braunstein has also proposed legislation which would make it a felony in New York State to record patients without having previously received consent from them.

Families Consider Legal Action Over Tragic Poisoning Deaths

Carbon monoxide is believed to be responsible for the tragic deaths of four people at the Evergreen Apartments at Riverfront Heights. On March 25th, Nancy Uniacke, Carl Dunfee, Veronica Mousely, and Andrew Spanakos lost their lives. Several other people living in the building were also hospitalized the same night.

Several of the buildings in the complex were immediately evacuated, but residents were allowed to return shortly afterwards. However, two of the buildings, Building G, the site of the deaths, and Building F were evacuated a second time on March 27th with no explanation to the residents.

Alex Rittberg, the program administrator at the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Environmental, and county officials inspected the site. The inspection revealed that Building G’s boiler room ventilation system was rusted and dilapidated.

Without proper ventilation, rather than escaping out the chimney, exhaust fumes filled the boiler room directly beneath the residents’ apartments. He said that the state will oversee the replacement of two of the boilers and other necessary repairs. New Castle County Police Cpl. Tom Jackson is also conducting an investigation.

Evergreen Apartments purchased Riverfront Heights last summer and owns several other apartment buildings in Wilmington and the surrounding area, including Brandywine Hills Apartments, Driftwood Club Apartments, Newport Terrace Apartments and Midway Park Apartments. Other properties include Evergreen Terrace Townhomes and Apartments in Elkton, Maryland, Evergreen Apartments at Christiana Reserve in Newark; and Hampton Attorney-Bartholomew-Dalton-quoteWalk Apartments in New Castle. Company spokespersons were unavailable for comment.

said that if it is proven that the ventilation system caused the deaths, it would be the basis for negligence lawsuits filed by anyone who was injured. For those who lost family members, wrongful death suits could be filed. He stated that there is an “obligation to make sure the systems providing those families with basic services are maintained. He added that “In wrongful death law, responsibility is the key word.”