WA Cities Must Pay $3 million Settlement In Man’s Killing By Police While Trying to Surrender

Three Washington cities will pay $3 million to settle a lawsuit filed by the family of an emotionally disturbed Montesano man killed by officers while he was trying to surrender to them.

Dozens of officers from Aberdeen, Montesano and Hoquiam surrounded the home of 43-year-old Patrick Easton West, who was on the phone with a negotiator who had announced West was calming down during the April 2019 incident. But the heavily armed officers who were part of a SWAT-like “critical response unit” charged inside West’s home anyway.

One officer carrying a bulletproof ballistic shield fired seven times at West, who was struck three times by bullets. West, who had no criminal history and did not have access to firearms, died the next day.

West’s family told police on the scene that he suffered from mental health issues and asked them to proceed cautiously. He had barricaded himself in his basement, carrying a metal bar with tape on the end that police called a “makeshift sword.” West threw the bar onto the lawn after officers ordered him to drop it, and then officers opened fire, according to the lawsuit.

Police claimed the bar hit an officer, but there was no evidence anyone was injured by it, according to police records and the lawsuit. When West hit a cedar fence with the metal bar, an officer was on the opposite side. A police chief said that amounted to assault on an officer and “we’re calling it a felony,” according to the lawsuit. That led to dozens of officers converging on the scene.

The family’s lawyer, Tim Ford, argued that officers unnecessarily escalated the incident as part of “their militarized response.” Despite their own negotiators noting that West was calming down, officers “approached the house with a heavily armed team to breach the door to Pat’s basement workshop with a battering ram.”

Once inside, officers yelled conflicting commands and one officer shot and killed West. The lawsuit argued that the special unit “engages in paramilitary tactical operations,” but the unit “rarely trains as an entire team, and the crisis negotiators train even less than the tactical officers.”

Pfizer Asks Judge to Intervene In Lawsuit Case Seeking COVID-19 Vaccine Information

Pfizer Inc. argues it should have a say in a lawsuit seeking information about its COVID-19 vaccine to ensure trade secrets and confidential commercial information are not disclosed.

A group of doctors and scientists sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in federal court in Texas, seeking details about the FDA’s licensing of the vaccine. Pfizer’s lawyers told U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman that the company should be allowed to join the case so it can help the FDA avoid “inappropriately” disclosing trade and corporate secrets.

The doctors and scientists who sued the FDA argue it’s too early for Pfizer to join the case because no one is challenging redactions made to the records requested in the lawsuit. The judge has ordered the quick release of hundreds of thousands of documents in the case, noting it’s “of paramount public importance.”

The FDA told the court it believes Pfizer can help the agency navigate the “unusual and indeed extraordinary circumstances of the case.” Government agencies like the FDA control the release of documents under the federal public records law, but companies like Pfizer can challenge and sue to block the release of certain information.

The federal judge will consider Pfizer’s request and is expected to address concerns raised by the FDA about his order to start releasing 55,000 pages of documents monthly in March. The FDA previously proposed releasing 500 pages a month in response to the lawsuit, a schedule that would require more than 50 years to complete. Pfizer argues its intervention in the lawsuit “will help accelerate the release of documents.”

Pfizer stated in its court filing that it supports public disclosure of the FDA records related to its vaccine “to promote transparency and the public’s confidence.”

But lawyers with Siri & Glimstad, a New York boutique firm that filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, argued Pfizer doesn’t need the court’s permission to help the FDA. The company can support the agency’s efforts to release the records without intervening in the lawsuit. The lawyers said they wouldn’t fight Pfizer’s intervention if the “involvement is limited to prevent delay or prejudice.”

Did Google and Facebook Executives Conspire to Drive up Ad Auction Prices? Amended Lawsuit Says Yes.

Further details of the multi-state lawsuit against Google and Facebook have recently emerged as the 2020 lawsuit was newly amended. The updated lawsuit accuses Google and Facebook of abusing their marketing power in 2015 to artificially inflate advertising auction prices to increase revenue, while agreeing to avoid competing with one another’s lucrative ad-tech businesses. Led by Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, fellow Republican AGs in Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Utah have joined together to accuse the digital giants of market manipulation. While AG Paxton calls the actions market manipulation, Google and Facebook claim the lawsuit is meritless.

Several documents support the accusations of collusion, as they outline the methods and show how executives at each company were involved.

At the heart of the pricing complaint is how Google and Facebook responded to the practice of automated header bidding. In the header bidding process, ad exchanges bid on inventory simultaneously before servers release it to the highest bidder. This helps publishers sell more ads, at more competitive rates.

The header bidding practice threatened Google’s ad revenue stream because publishers could sell their inventory directly instead of using Google’s ad serving technology, of which Google takes a cut. To combat these potential losses of ad commissions, Google developed an alternative called open bidding.

The lawsuit alleges that Google worked out a deal with Facebook to support its open bidding process instead of header bidding, even suggesting that Google CEO Sundar Pichai personally signed off on the terms of the agreement. One smoking gun email from Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg referred to the arrangement with Google as a “big deal strategically.” Other emails indicated that CEO Mark Zuckerberg would need to OK the deal.

Newspaper trade group representative David Chavern, CEO of the News Media Alliance, summed up the sentiment of many publishers with his comments: “Anti-competitive side deals and market manipulation don’t count as innovation. Google has been purposely suppressing news publishers’ finances for years and then asking us to say thank you.”

Google and Meta (formerly Facebook) say their efforts were neither secret nor inappropriate, citing examples of public announcements such as this blog that predated the lawsuit by years. According to a Meta spokesperson, “these business relationships enable Meta to deliver more value to advertisers while fairly compensating publishers, resulting in better outcomes for all.”

Sports Betting Lawsuit Filed By Card-Room Operator in Washington State

Maverick Gaming, LLC, owner of 19 of the 44 gaming rooms in the state of Washington, recently filed a federal lawsuit against state officials claiming that Native American casinos were illegally permitted to engage in betting that was believed to be a “discriminatory tribal gaming monopoly.” This lawsuit may temporarily place all betting on hold, which has gamers and gaming room owners experiencing heightened stress levels. Gamers may have to wait until the lawsuit is settled to participate in their usual gambling, which includes roulette, craps, and more.

Sports betting was approved for tribal casinos in March of 2020 and went into effect in September of 2021. Maverick’s owner, Eric Persson, stated that he simply wants to be treated fairly and be allowed to participate in the betting just as tribal establishments are. Persson feels that the ability to participate in the same types of gambling as tribal members are would create substantially more jobs and dramatically increase the amount of revenue that is brought in at all gaming rooms.

Prior to filing the lawsuit, Persson reports having made several attempts to lobby lawmakers over the past few years, in an effort to request that sports gambling be permitted at all casinos instead of limiting it just to tribal establishments. However, after several unsuccessful attempts at obtaining a hearing, Persson decided that filing a lawsuit was the next logical step.

The executive director of the Washington Indian Gaming Association, Rebecca George, has responded to the lawsuit and feels that Maverick Gaming, LLC is making a desperate attempt to reverse a law that was put into place for an important purpose. The representative also predicted that if Persson’s lawsuit were to somehow end in success, that it could cause irreparable damage to tribal communities, but also to the general public.

George further stated that should this “unmerited” lawsuit be approved, that it would undermine the rules of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act as well as Washington state law. The executive director further explained that a well-established gaming system was agreed upon several decades ago and that approving Persson’s request could be extremely harmful and undue an agreement that was working optimally for so many years.

Are You Due Damages? Here Is What You Should Know

Are You Due Damages? Here Is What You Should Know

Have you suffered damages due to somebody else? If you have, it makes sense to talk to a personal injury lawyer to ensure your rights are respected and that you are awarded compensation for your personal injury and damages.

Due damages? Here is what you need to know:

Type Of Damages

When it comes to compensation for damages in personal injury cases, there are a few different kinds that you may be eligible for:

  • Medical treatment
  • Lost wages
  • Property loss
  • Loss of consortium
  • Emotional distress

Don’t forget to add in special damages to your personal injury suit, if applicable. These include things like sick time used during recuperation, medication costs, and basically any other out-of-pocket expenses that you have incurred. Keep copious track with receipts.

Steps To Recover Damages

Now that you know what you are owed, how do you go about recovering damages? There is a bit of a process that you will go through, which is another compelling reason to be represented by a qualified personal injury attorney. Here is what to expect:

Initial Consultation

First things first: make an appointment to speak with a personal injury lawyer. Most will schedule an initial consultation at no charge- and do not get paid until you are compensated. Your attorney should be able to explain elements of law and inform you if you have a case during this meeting.

File Court Documents

It is imperative that you file your court paperwork and documents on time. Failure to meet stringent timelines could make you ineligible for compensation- and you may have to begin the process all over again. Consider how your paperwork documents your case and put effort into finding it and keeping it organized for attorneys and the court process to come.

Pretrial Motions

Your lawyer will now make pretrial motions on your behavior to build your case and show the evidence that you have documented and prepared. This is a very important phase that can make or break your entire case.

Negotiate a Settlement

Before you go to court, negotiations may occur. This is when lawyers and parties involved try to figure out what is due, and whether anyone is going to compensate you. If your case is strong, the negotiations may reflect this as the other party may be reticent to take the case to court.

Attend Mediation

If negotiations fail, you may be asked to participate in mediation. This is yet another attempt to resolve the issue- or you and your attorney may choose to take it to court.

If this seems like a lot, it can be! Many parties do not make it easy to get compensation for damages that you have suffered, which is why personal injury attorneys are so important. Don’t settle for less than you deserve- get compensated for your injury and your damages. Talk to a reputable personal injury law firm to learn more.

The Process of Filing a Personal Injury Insurance Claim

Even though you always put safety at the top of your priority list, other drivers might not do the same thing. Even seemingly minor accidents can lead to significant injuries. If you have been involved in an accident that is not your fault, you should not be responsible for all of your medical expenses. That is why you may decide to file a personal injury lawsuit against the insurance provider of the other driver.

A personal injury insurance claim can be brought by someone who has suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident. In the lawsuit, you will seek financial compensation for any losses or injuries you might have sustained. This compensation can replace lost income, cover medical expenses, and replace property you may have lost.

If you are not at fault for the accident, you can claim that the other person was responsible and ask the insurance company to honor the insurance policy and compensate you accordingly. The insurance company will have an adjuster who investigates the facts of the accident, and you should work with a personal injury lawyer who can guide you through the process.

A personal injury lawyer can help you collect the necessary documents to put your personal injury claim in the best position possible to succeed. The lawyer can then present the evidence to the court, helping you seek as much financial compensation as possible. This could drive the insurance company to the table, helping you get a more favorable settlement.

Even though a lot of personal injury claims result in a financial settlement, a personal injury lawyer can take a look at your injuries, compare them to the insurance policy, and make sure you are compensated appropriately. This requires training and experience, so you should rely on a personal injury lawyer to assist you.

Every accident is different, and a personal injury insurance claim can be complicated. You should rely on a personal injury attorney who can help you every step of the way. That way, you receive as much financial compensation as possible. You should not speak to an insurance company without a lawyer who can advocate on your behalf. Even if you think the facts of the case are on your side, you should retain a personal injury lawyer who can assist you.

Latest Lawsuit Filed by WEICU Related to the 2020 Election Met with Skepticism from Judge

Even though the calendar has recently turned to 2022, there are still some people who are seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Recently, a Washington state Supreme Court commissioner listened to arguments related to a lawsuit that alleged widespread voter fraud took place during the 2020 election. The lawsuit was brought by the Washington Election Integrity Coalition United (WEICU) and makes claims that thousands of individuals who are not citizens of the United States illegally submitted ballots in 2020.

The group claims that a preliminary investigation took place showing that more than 34,000 people who are not citizens were registered to vote in King County. The lawsuit makes similar claims related to other counties across the state, including the Kemah, Clark, Pierce, and Snohomish. These claims are founded on statements made by an employee of the Department of Licensing.

The judge who listened to the case was skeptical. He noted that there was nothing in the claims that supported the overwhelming numbers. He denied that the statements of a single employee could be labeled as evidence. He questioned the dependability of the single employee, saying that it was not only hearsay but also double hearsay. Color members of the governor, including a spokesperson for Governor Inslee’s Office, stated that there is no competent evidence supporting the allegations of widespread voter fraud made in the lawsuit. He stated that the statements of one employee from a political rally are not enough to support the significant numbers.

This is not the first time that WEICU has filed lawsuits related to allegations of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 election. Recently, a judge in Franklin County dismissed one of their lawsuits, stating that the lawsuit had not only missed the deadline to file a lawsuit based on the laws in the state but also was not filed by a licensed attorney.

Even though the results of this lawsuit have not yet been decided, the judge will weigh the arguments from WEICU, listen to arguments from the defendants, and decide whether the case should be referred to the state supreme court, send it back to a different court, or dismiss the lawsuit entirely.

Why You Should Always Work With a Personal Injury Lawyer When Filing a Personal Injury Claim

If you have been involved in a serious accident that is the fault of someone else, you may think that you should not be responsible for your medical bills. That is where filing a personal injury claim can be helpful. Even though you are legally allowed to file a personal injury claim without a lawyer, you should refrain from doing so. Even if you think the facts and the law are on your side, you need to work with an experienced legal professional who can put you in the best position possible to be successful.

First, if you are filing a personal injury claim, you have suffered serious injuries. You deserve to focus all of your attention on your medical recovery. If you file a personal injury claim on your own, you’ll be stuck spending all of your time doing paperwork instead of focusing on your recovery. You’ll need to get the accident report from the police, get your medical records from your doctor, and try to arrange for witness testimony. You should let the lawyer do this for you so you can focus on your medical recovery.

Furthermore, every personal injury claim is different. Your case is unique, and you require someone with the right experience and knowledge to handle your case for you. How much is your injury worth? What is a fair settlement offer? You need a lawyer with the right experience to advocate on your behalf.

In addition, the insurance companies will have experienced lawyers as well. If you file a personal injury claim against a specific individual, they will probably have lawyers as well. Opposing lawyers can be intimidating, and they can make life difficult. You need to have a lawyer in your corner who can fight for your rights as well.

If you have been involved in a serious accident, you deserve to have the representation of a personal injury lawyer who will fight for your best interests. Even though it is true that a personal injury lawyer may take a portion of your settlement, you will likely still end up with more money if you work with an experienced personal injury attorney. Furthermore, you can save time and stress by focusing on your medical recovery instead of worrying about paperwork.

Washington State House of Representatives GOP Members File Lawsuit Against New COVID Vaccine Requirements

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on individuals, families, and small businesses. Now that numerous vaccines have received full FDA approval, many companies are requiring their employees to be vaccinated. Furthermore, the Washington legislature has instituted a policy requiring state representatives to present proof of vaccinations against COVID-19 before they are allowed on the floor of the house.

Recently, several Republican members of the Washington State House of Representatives filed a lawsuit seeking to halt the requirement that members show proof of vaccination against COVID-19 before moving to the floor of the house. The lawsuit asked for an injunction until the full legal challenge could be heard.

In the lawsuit, the members are claiming that the new policy limits access to facilities in the House of Representatives unlawfully. The lawsuit also claims that the new requirement violates the First Amendment rights of the members of the House of Representatives. In addition, the lawsuit targets house restrictions that prevent representatives from accessing their offices without proof of vaccination.

A judge in the Superior Court in the state of Washington disagreed with the position of the plaintiffs. She stated that the plaintiffs had not met the threshold to be granted a preliminary injunction. She claims that the restrictions do not prevent the legislators from doing their jobs, and denied them the preliminary injunction. Of note, this preliminary denial does not mean that the lawsuit is unsuccessful. It simply means that the legislators will not have the requirements halted temporarily until the fall case can be heard.

It will be interesting to see what happens with the case moving forward. There are numerous controversies taking place across the country related to vaccination requirements. For example, the state senate allows legislators and their staffers to be on the floor of the Senate regardless of vaccination status. Members simply need to receive a negative test before they are allowed on the floor of the Senate.

The results of this lawsuit could be seen as a precedent for the rest of the state. Even though it might be a while before the case is heard, everyone in the state of Washington will follow the lawsuit closely.

Lawsuit Filed in Washington State Related to Poor Learning Conditions for Students

Children require adequate buildings in which to learn, and a lawyer in Washington has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a small district in Washington state. The lawsuit claims that the buildings are in such poor condition that the children are unable to learn. In the lawsuit, the lawyer claims that public education is supposed to be an equalizer across the country, giving everyone an equal opportunity to succeed. The lawsuit goes on to claim that the Wahkiakum School District does not have the funding to maintain its buildings, creating inequality in schools districts across the state.

The school district is small, representing fewer than 500 students, and the lawyer claims that the district is being overlooked. The lawsuit further claims that the state of Washington is violating its own Constitution by not providing students with modern buildings in which to learn.

Approximately 10 years ago, the same lawyer filed and won a lawsuit when the Washington state supreme court agreed with him and the argument that the state was not giving enough funding to provide all students with ample access to basic education. As a result of the case, many school districts had to find new sources of funding instead of relying solely on property taxes.

The lawsuit goes on to argue that many of the smaller districts are being hurt because wealthy districts often vote in favor of raising property taxes to fund their schools. On the other hand, smaller districts may not have the capital to increase their property taxes, causing their buildings to fall into a state of disrepair.

In addition, residents who live in wealthier districts may pay a lower property tax percentage that still results in greater revenue because their properties are worth more. The end result is that wealthier districts have more resources to construct new buildings and provide better equipment to teachers and their students.

The lawsuit is expected to go to the state supreme court and could have a significant impact across the state, particularly in small and rural districts. People across the state of Washington will watch the results of the lawsuit carefully because it could have impacts not only in the Wahkiakum School District but others as well.