Even though sports fans have been starved for live-action in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a strikeout recorded of sorts earlier this April in a federal district court. Taking place in New York, the case was Olson v. MLB. Mr. Olson is a daily fantasy sports player who brought a lawsuit against two of the biggest teams in all of baseball, the Houston Astros and the Boston Red Sox, who have both won World Series titles recently. They have also been widely linked to the sign-stealing scandal that has plagued the MLB for the past few months.

During the sign-stealing scandal, players in the dugout would be using video cameras to watch the signs the catcher puts down, indicating the pitch. Then, players in the dugout would bang on a garbage can. This would let the batter know if a breaking ball was coming or not. This advantage makes it easier for the player to make solid contact with the ball. Presumably, this helped both teams to their World Series titles.

In the lawsuit, Olson alleged that the sign-stealing scheme breached a duty of care held by the MLB that they needed to ensure the games were being played within the rules. He alleged that this impacted his daily fantasy sports winnings. It turns out that the court was not buying his argument.

In a decision that was well-reasoned, the federal court granted the motion put forth by the defendants to dismiss the lawsuit. This relegated Olson to the long list of sports consumers, fans, and spectators who have tried to sue sports leagues in the past for a variety of reasons.

When it comes to sports fans, everyone experiences the agony of defeat and the jubilation of victory; however, there is no duty on behalf of the sports leagues to compensate fans who feel cheated out of their enjoyment in some way. Numerous complaints have been taken up over the years, even by customers who have bought tickets. This decision simply falls in line with what courts have found in the past. It will be interesting to see if fans continue to try to sue sports leagues in the future.

Unfortunately, an accident can happen at any time. Many people suffer injuries in these accidents. These injuries can be costly between doctors’ bills, surgical costs, repair bills, and potential lost income due to time off from work. Fortunately, there is a path for people to seek financial compensation following a serious injury; however, the portrayal that many people see on TV when it comes to personal injury lawsuits is not usually accurate. In order for someone to seek financial compensation for their injuries, they will need to provide ample evidence and demonstrate that they have met significant burdens of proof to win a financial award. There are a few common misconceptions that need to be corrected.

First, there is a common misconception that people can collect money just by having any type of pain. This is not always the case. While it is relatively straightforward for people to talk to an insurance company and collect compensation for medical bills and lost wages, collecting compensation for pain and suffering is significantly more difficult. There are three types of injury categories following a major accident that someone for which can collect pain and suffering compensation. These include loss of bodily limbs, loss of bodily function, and wrongful death claims (collected by surviving kin). If any of these events took place, it is possible to collect more money for pain and compensation.

Next, many people believe that if they drag out the lawsuit, they are more likely to collect more money. This is not the case. In reality, it will be a hassle to continue to chase down the other party in a lawsuit. They are simply going to become aggravated and will be less likely to communicate in a professional manner. Furthermore, this is also more likely to drive up the attorneys’ fees, which may detract from the overall award. Finally, plaintiffs will also need to track every receipt. The longer the case goes on, the more likely it is that some of these will be lost.

Finally, many people think that they don’t need a lawyer. The reality is that lawyers are necessary to make sure that plaintiffs settle for an amount that is fair. This is important for making sure that everyone protects their rights, particularly in a case that involves a serious injury.

Dealing with the wrongful death of a loved one can be a devastating situation. It is terrible to deal with the premature loss of a family member or friend and the final expenses following a wrongful death can be significant. One of the biggest expenses that people have to bear is that of a funeral. It is possible for someone to receive compensation for the costs of a funeral and burial; however, it is necessary to file a wrongful death lawsuit against the party who is at-fault in the case.

It is terrible to deal with the unexpected loss of a loved one and this is among the most challenging emotional experiences that someone can have. Funerals cost thousands of dollars and many people do not have this kind of money sitting in a savings account. Do you? Furthermore, if there are avenues to force the at-fault party to cover this cost, then this is only appropriate.

First, it is important for everyone to know what costs are covered by a wrongful death lawsuit. It is always important to speak with an experienced attorney because these cases are highly complex and people need to know what kind of compensation they can expect. Some of the costs include:

• The cost of cremation services or a plot of land
• The cost of the funeral and burial
• Money paid for the tombstone and casket
• Any rental fees for the funeral home, hearse, and other transportation arrangements

Therefore, it is important for everyone to track these costs so that the wrongful death lawsuit can be compensated appropriately. It is important for everyone to remember that they should not just accept a settlement because they need the money. An insurance company will try to force a quick payment to get away with paying less than is deserved. People need to be patient and wait for the outcome of the case. Even though this won’t be immediate, it is critical for everyone to fight for the compensation they deserve. Do not allow an insurance company to get away with taking advantage of someone’s grief. Following the loss of a loved one in a wrongful death scenario, filing a lawsuit is the most appropriate course of action.

Dollar Tree, the company known for producing inexpensive goods in a variety of categories, recently requested approval for a significant settlement to bring an end to a lawsuit brought against it by employees. The plaintiffs in the suit, Snipes vs. Dollar Tree, have requested approval for a $2.5 million settlement that would bring an end to litigation. In the case, the plaintiffs alleged that Dollar Tree had committed wage violations. Some of the violations included not allowing employees to take proper rest breaks, allowing them to recharge and continue their shifts. The plaintiffs included anyone who worked at a distribution center as part of the Dollar Tree corporation between April of 2011 and the end of 2019.

The plaintiff who brought the suit against Dollar Tree is named Terry Snipes. He filed suit against the large corporation in April of 2015. The suit and class membership have been made more complicated by the employee arbitration program that has been set up by Dollar Tree.

The lead plaintiff decided to exit this program before he brought a lawsuit against the company. Back in May, a United States District Judge was asked by Dollar Tree to force the arbitration members that were signed by around 1,600 employees following the October 6, 2014 cutoff.

The judge agreed and forced the claims to head into arbitration if they signed arbitration pacts following the October cutoff; however, these employees are still allowed to have access to the settlement agreement.

In the original suit, the plaintiffs alleged that these accusations are a violation of California state law. The workers stated that the company did not give them appropriate breaks and maintained poor practices with regards to their timekeeping. The settlement amount is a big victory for the workers. The workers state that the settlement represents an outstanding result, given the relative strengths and weaknesses of the case. The settlement includes $125,000 towards claims under the California Private Attorneys General Act, more than $90,000 going towards the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and $750,000 in fees for the legal team. The 2,400 members of the class action settlement will each get around $625 each. This is a major victory for workers in the state of California.