Washington State: Leading the Way with Innovative LLLT Program

Civil justice issues are a common problem for many Americans. From dealing with family issues such as divorce and child custody to responding to lawsuits, the complexities involve issues normally requiring the assistance of a lawyer. However, according to various studies, 80 to 90 percent of those in low-income brackets facing civil legal problems never receive that essential legal assistance. In fact, Risa Kaufman, a Columbia law professor, calls the lack of access to legal assistance a “human rights crisis.”

Washington State’s Limited License Legal Technicians Concept

LLLT-quote-1In a bold and creative attempt to address this issue, Washington is the first state in the nation to introduce an innovative solution. Called the Limited License Legal Technician (LLLT) program, this legislation borrows a concept from the medical profession. When the medical community faced a similar crisis in the 1970’s, additional provider roles were created. Now, providers such as Nurse practitioners commonly help ensure broader access to health care by taking on many of the basic procedures normally performed by an M.D. ARNP’s operate independently and efficiently to clear out the backlog of more common medical issues in many practices and areas.

Similarly, the LLLT helps clients with a number of routine but vital legal needs. They can assist clients in conducting legal research, filing court documents, and responding to legal filings from others. According to the executive director of the Washington State Bar Association, Paula Littlewood, “(The LLLT program) will save time and heartache. It’s groundbreaking.

Addressing a Growing Problem

Accessing affordable legal assistance is an increasingly challenging problem for the poor and those with limited to moderate incomes. The hourly rates for lawyers are often out of reach for those of moderate means. Additionally, the traditional resources for these families, primarily legal aid offices, are losing funding, limiting services, and closing in many areas.

LLLT-quote-3To counter this trend, the Washington state created the limited license legal technician profession. The program is currently only available in the area of family law, but is expected to expand to other areas of law in the future. An individual pursuing this license must have a paralegal degree from an ABA approved law school, unless the prospective LLLT qualifies under the limited time waiver. The waiver allows those with substantial legal experience a time limited opportunity to apply for the LLLT program based on their work history.

Additionally, a LLLT must complete roughly a year of special classes at an approved university or community college and take a licensing exam. Upon passing and completing at least 3,000 hours of substantive law related work experience supervised by a lawyer (the 3,000 hours must be within 3 years before or after passing the exam), they are able to work independently with clients. By saving potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal education costs, these LLLTs are able to charge significantly lower fees for their work.

The concept of the LLLT program has created a lot of discussion among the legal community – both negative and positive. Despite the expected resistance, the American Bar Association itself recommended in the final report of its 2014 Task Force on the Future of Legal Education, that states consider licensing “persons other than holders of a JD to deliver limited legal services.” The entire concept is now under review by the ABA’s Commission on the Future of Legal Services.

The success of this program is being followed closely by many in California, New Mexico, Oregon, Colorado, and other states. Seen as a potentially trans-formative way to provide necessary legal assistance, this program may spread rapidly throughout the country.

Federal Judge Dismisses Gun-Carry Lawsuit Brought By Former D.C. Correctional Officers

What is the Basis of the Gun-Carry Lawsuit?

This lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court on behalf of four retired officers from the Washington D.C. Department of Corrections, Ronald DuBerry, Robert L. Smith, Harold Bennette, and Maurice Curtis. The suit alleges that the four corrections officers were unfairly denied documentation necessary to obtain permission from licensing agencies to carry firearms as a right bestowed on them by the federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA).

LEOSA, which became a federal law in 2004 when it was signed by then President George W. Bush, was created to grant “qualified retired law enforcement officers” the right to carry a firearm at any time without having to apply for dc-department-of-correctionsa state license.

The four plaintiffs asserted that the ability to carry firearms is a necessity due to threats they have received from former inmates they encountered. In order to qualify for LEOSA, retired officers must have certified documentation from their former employer confirming their prior qualified law enforcement experience. The D.C. Department of Corrections has conversely affirmed that corrections officers do not qualify for the statute due to their lack of both official law enforcement status and authority to arrest.

What was the Judge’s Ruling?

Although U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras dismissed the suit, he did so on the basis of a technicality and did not directly address the question at the heart of the lawsuit. According to the Washington Times, Judge Contreras issued a 36-page opinion noting that the four officers incorrectly asserted their right to be certified, instead of declaring their right to carry as a matter of federal law. The Judge suggested that the officers should continue their pursuit through alternate channels, such as the D.C. Superior Court or through administrative measures.

Is the Lawsuit Dead?

Attorney Aaron Page, representing the four officers, said in a statement that his clients plan to follow the advice of retired-officersJudge Contreras and continue their case via appeals and contacting D.C. lawmakers. The retired officers continue to assert that they are being denied a right they have earned as former law enforcement officers, and will seek remedy through any available Avenue.

Settlement Agreed Upon in Lawsuit Against Lakewood Police Department

Brian Wurts, a former Lakewood officer and police union president has settled in a federal lawsuit following allegations that he was fired because of his involvement in the union, for being outspoken against officials, and for his sexual orientation.

The department never gave an official public reason for his termination, stating instead that it was “a personnel department-fired-himmatter”. The department’s attorney claims that he lost his job for failure to act. The department that fired him unofficially claimed that they did so because of the case against former officer Skeeter Manos, who was arrested for stealing memorial funds set aside for families of officers slain in 2009.

They claim that Wurts knew of Manos’ actions and did not take action against him. Manos makes no such claims.  Wurts claims he knew nothing of Manos’ actions and that the department was looking for a reason to dismiss him.

He was officially fired in December 2012, after an administrative leave during which he was investigated by his own department. The FBI investigated him and cleared him of this crime when they did their initial investigations against Manos, who pleaded guilty and received just under three years in prison.

Wrongful termination suits for sexual orientation are on the rise, and whether or not this was the Lakewood Police Department’s motivation, the case will set a precedent for future employers considering terminating an employee because of their sexual orientation or any other aspect of their personality that does not affect the job.

Brian Wurts has made waves in his department in several ways. While under investigation it was discovered that he had sex, while on duty, with a fellow officer. The department does not list this a the reason for dismissal. He has also sexual-orientationspoken up for Manos during his investigation in his role as union president. Whether it was his sexual orientation, behavior on the job, or outspoken role as union president, he made some enemies high up in the department. When the information all came to light in the lawsuit, it seemed better for some to settle.

The lawsuit settlement payment that Brian Wurts received was $150,000, he has not been available for comment after the settlement of his wrongful termination lawsuit. The city counter sued in this case, but their claims were dismissed as a part of the settlement.

BNSF Sued for Alleged Cold Train Contract Breach

In recent Bellingham news, former executives of the now defunct Cold Train express produce service from Washington to Chicago have sued BNSF Railway in U.S. District Court in Spokane for a sum in excess of $41 million. This lawsuit suggests an alleged breach of contract for the 72 hour service guarantee for delivery of produce from the Northwest to Chicago.

lawsuit-bnsfIn the lawsuit filed on April 7, 2015, the former executives allege that BNSF turned their business into a train wreck when BNSF gave preference to oil and coal trains destined for the Pacific Northwest. In the lawsuit, Cold Train maintained that, in reliance on its agreement with BNSF, it ordered more refrigerated rail cars and even entered into an agreement with a purchaser to buy the company. According to The Capital Press, Cold Train claims a $31.7 million loss on the sale of the company along with an additional $6 million in damages for the contracts on the additional refrigerated cars.

The former Cold Train executives say that everything changed when BNSF changed its service guarantee from a 72 hour transit time to 125 hours. Although not yet having been served with the lawsuit, BNSF commented on it and related that indeed it did experience service issues during the winter of 2013 due energy demand coupled with severe winter weather.

Before the service guarantee change, Cold Train had experienced strong growth. After the 72 hour service guarantee contract was entered into, delivery of the refrigerated containers was on time 92 percent of the time.  Cold Train claims that figure was reduced to less than five percent of the time by 2014. Its former executives maintain that former-executives-cold-trainBNSF was making so much money shipping coal and oil, that it didn’t have sufficient space for the Cold Train containers.

Cold train was in business from April of 2010 until August of 2014. It grew from 300 to over 700 refrigerated containers and was expected to grow to 1,000 carrying Washington apples, produce and frozen foods to Chicago. These products were arriving to eastern destinations faster and fresher. It isn’t known if the case will reach trial. Lawsuit settlement cases are a large segment of the litigation process.

Ex-Wife Sues “Monsters in the Morning” Host in Defamation Lawsuit Backed by High-Profile Lawyer Gloria Allred

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, but what if her high-profile husband violated her right to privacy? In a new defamation lawsuit, Samantha Boomer, ex-wife of Orlando-based “Monsters in the Morning” radio host, Russ Rollins, alleges bullying and invasion of privacy in their bitter breakup.

The suit stems from an elaborate hoax in which the popular broadcaster misled his audience into thinking he was served divorce papers live on the air, eliciting passionate listener reactions. You can watch the original video HERE. The iHeartMedia personality assumed the dramatic prank was all fun and games, but now, famed celebrity human cyber-bully-social-mediarights lawyer Gloria Allred is involved. In a news conference, Allred announced her client’s merciless taunting, proclaiming her a victim of bullying both online and in her Florida community.

In the age of social media, cyber bullying, is on the tip of Americans’ tongues. After the stunt, Boomer claims she was tormented in online forums like the comments section of this Barstool Sports article (NSFW), which has since been disabled. Writers of the website openly shamed Boomer, inciting recent feminist backlash. Supported by Allred, she alleges emotional distress perpetuated by the video and listeners’ hateful comments, calling for Rollins and his employer to pay up. The case raises tricky questions regarding social media responsibility, the blending of real-life controversy and entertainment, and what constitutes legal liability when a person’s reputation is on the line.

“Monsters in the Morning” is known for its bawdy humor, but in hindsight, Rollins’ stunt seems an obvious recipe for disaster–despite his successful ploy for ratings. He and Boomer have a storied history of make-ups and break-ups, and the feuding spouses recently underwent a lengthy divorce settlement. Revelations of Rollins’ alleged boomers-lawsuitviolence against his ex-wife, some seven instances of domestic abuse, make his on-air actions a bit precarious.

In light of Boomer’s lawsuit, the radio station is now backpedaling, issuing a public statement apologizing for Rollins “incorrectly” stating his wife had ordered papers to be served during the broadcast. Central Florida’s news affiliate WFTV 9 has been leading reports on the controversy since February, but as of Monday, the talk show comedian refused to further comment.

What do you think: did the prank go too far?

Swedish Furniture Manufacturer IKEA Named in Wrongful Death Lawsuit

IKEA’s failure to provide the necessary hardware to attach a dresser permanently to the wall has led to a wrongful death lawsuit. Parents Jacquelyn and Jacob Collas are suing the Scandinavian furniture chain for the wrongful death of their toddler killed by an IKEA dresser.

heaven-has-a-hero-websiteOn February 25, 2014, Mrs. Collas of West Chester, Pennsylvania found her two-year-old son, Curren, unresponsive in his room. Curren was trapped between his overturned IKEA MALM chest of drawers and his bed with the full weight of the dresser on his chest. The boy died later that morning at Paoli Hospital. Since Curren’s death, Collas has begun the web site Heaven Has a Hero in an effort to warn other parents of the dangers posed by unsecured furniture in the home. She urges parents,

I wanted to share this because I want you to learn from my mistakes. Bolt EVERYTHING down. Dressers, bookshelves, TVs, anything that could possibly fall.

The wrongful death lawsuit filed by the Collases’ alleges that the death was a preventable occurrence. Knowing that the dresser weighed in excess of 130 pounds and that it had a risk of easily tipping over, the Collas family believes the furniture manufacturer and retailer should routinely include anchoring hardware, consumer warnings, and safety instructions with its products.

consumer-reports-injuriesThe Colasses’ dresser and other similar products, unanchored, represent a significant hazard especially to young children like Curren who are naturally curious. According to the complaint, “the IKEA defendants were aware of a tip-over hazard arising from falling vertical dressers and other furniture. According to estimates from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, more than 43,000 consumers are injured each year in tip-over incidents, with more than 25,000 of those injuries to children under the age of 18.” With these statistics, it leaves one wondering why anchoring hardware is not included with these products.

IKEA spokeswoman, Mona Astra Liss issued this statement in response to the lawsuit, “All of our products go through extensive testing and are regularly evaluated. IKEA chests of drawers are safe for their intended use when properly assembled and permanently attached to the wall, in accordance with the warnings and instructions.”

$1.2 Million Lawsuit Settlement Payment in Seattle Archdiocese Case

A 63-year old woman received a $1.2 million settlement payment from the Archdiocese of Seattle as compensation for her suffering from years prior. The woman suffered sexual abuse, according to the case, at the hands of Father Michael Cody. She was a child at the time, in the late 1960’s, when she came into contact with the priest while he served at St. Charles Parish. The lawsuit settlement payment was, according to her attorney, a fair and reasonable amount of money due to the type and amount of abuse the accuser, Jeri Hubbard, suffered through.

Factors Leading to the Sexual Abuse Lawsuit and Settlement

according-to-lawsuitAccording to the lawsuit, the accuser, who agreed to be named, suffered abuse at the hands of Cody after a psychiatrist identified him as a pedophile. The lawsuit alleged that the church knew that he had already molested eight other children, all of which who were under the age of 18. The archbishop at the time sent Cody to receive treatment, but he was allowed to come back to the church, even though the parish knew he was still a danger to children. For Hubbard, the abuse began in 1967 and continued for the next five years.

Initially, the Archdiocese denied that the allegations were true, but on the day prior to the announcement of the lawsuit settlement payment, admitted liability for the abuse, which was acknowledged by the Superior Court Judge overseeing the case.

While the case for Hubbard may be over, there are still other victims who have come forward. Three additional sexual abuse lawsuits have been filed against the Seattle Archdiocese, all alleging molestation against Cody. Each of seattle-archidiocesthe previously resolved cases have been settled out of court. Interestingly, Hubbard could have settled her case earlier, but refused to do so until the Archdiocese admitted to moving a sexual predator into the community.

The Seattle Archdiocese has agreed to pay more than $12 million in another case in which 30 men were sexually abused as students. In total, since 2003, the Catholic Church has paid more than $3 billion to victims around the United States who were sexually abused by clergy members, reports BishopAccountability.org.

Bless Me Father Because You Have Sinned

Troubled teens that go to their Catholic priest for confession and ask for help, sometimes get more troubles instead. Such is the claim made in a lawsuit filed against the Catholic Archdiocese in San Antonio, Texas by a man who claims a priest sexually abused him when he was a child during the 1980s.

lawsuit-alleges-sexual-abuseAs reported by Channel 5 KENS Eyewitness News, the alleged abuse came from Jesus (Jesse) Dominguez who was a seminary student during the time and later became a priest. The lawsuit alleges that while the boy was an orphan, Dominguez gained his trust by buying him clothes and taking him on outings.

During the two-year period of contact, each outing resulted at the end with sexual molestation. This happened two or three times per week. When the boy expressed discomfort with the situation, Dominguez feigned heart attacks and threatened to kill the boy and himself if the situation was revealed to anyone.

The confused youth did not know what to do, so he sought help from a different priest in another parish. This is one of the unusual sexual abuse lawsuit cases handled by sexual abuse attorneys, in that it alleges that not only did the boy not receive the help he was seeking, but the other priest abused him sexually as well. The reason that the Archdiocese is the target of the suit is because the lawsuit alleges that they knew of the problem and rather than report the crimes to appropriate authorities, chose instead to cover them up.

abuse-led-to-anger-substance-abuseSince that time, the boy has grown to be an adult man. He claims in the lawsuit to suffer from depression, anger, and that the memories of the haunting experience of sexual abuse as a child led him to destroy his life with substance abuse.

The alleged perpetrator, “Father Jesse,” whose full name is Jesus Armando Dominguez was charged in another locale with sexual child abuse. According to the L.A. Times, in 2005, Dominguez faces 56 counts of sexual abuse for criminal cases in California where he served as a priest in the communities of Coachella and Perris.

Father Jesse was defrocked because of these allegations. He fled prosecution. It is presumed he is somewhere in Mexico. Mexico has no extradition agreement with the United States. Capturing Jesus Armando Dominguez in Mexico to bring him to justice in the USA is kidnapping since no charges have been filed in Mexico. Unless he returns to the U.S., it appears the ex-priest got away with his crimes. However, depending on the results of the lawsuit the Archdiocese may have to pay.

Closing Arguments Begin In Christopher Monfort Murder Trial

Christopher Monfort is facing accusations of five felonies. Among them, aggravated first-degree murder in the death of Seattle police Officer Timothy Brenton in 2009. If Monfort is convicted on the aggravated murder charges, he potentially faces the death penalty. The trial is winding down and closing arguments have recently begun.  These quick facts will bring you up to speed on the details of this case, which resulted in a police officer being killed.

Who is the Defendant?

christopher-monfort-killed-seattle-police-officerChristopher Monfort is a 46 year-old man accused of killing a Seattle police officer in 2009.  He is also facing accusations that he attempted to kill other officers with various weapons such as pipe bombs and fires. He has been described by the state as a violent extremist who was attempting to start a war with the Seattle Police Department. His trial began in January and is expected to conclude soon.

What is the Defense?

Monfort pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to the aggravated murder charges, as well as the other felonies for which he is on trial. The defense hired a single mental health expert, Dr. Mark Cunningham from Texas, to assert that Monfort suffers from delusions which moved him to kill the officer and attempt to kill others. The main crux of the defense centers on the idea that Monfort’s actions were spurred by such intense hatred, they could only be the actions of a delusional person. According to the Seattle Times, the King County prosecutor said of the insanity defense, “They had no choice. There is no other defense in this case.”

What is the Prosecution’s Strategy?

although-not-normal-not-insaneThe prosecutors are attempting to discredit the notion that Monfort was motivated by delusions, arguing that, “although he is not normal, he is not necessarily insane.” The state consulted with their own mental health expert witness, university professor Ronald Schouten, and attempted to undermine the credibility of defense witness Cunningham. Senior Deputy Prosecutor Jeff Baird described Cunningham as a “professional witness” who gave unclear answers and cherry-picked evidence in order to make his diagnosis. The prosecution noted that, based on discrepancies concerning Monfort’s attitude before and after the killing, the defense was unable to show when Monfort became delusional.

Fort Wayne Businessman Hit Again With Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Who is R. Bruce Dye?

state-records-indiana-state-republicanR. Bruce Dye is a well-known Fort Wayne entrepreneur who has founded several companies, notably Heritage Food Service Group, Inc., and Hotel Fitness. According to state records, Dye is one of the top donors to the Indiana State Republican Party, having donated hundreds of thousands of dollars in recent election cycles. He was first the defendant in a sexual abuse lawsuit by Kathy Gonya, Dye’s former executive assistant at his company, Brigadoon Financial, Inc. dba Brigadoon Fitness. Gonya filed the suit in late 2014, after claiming she was terminated from the company due to reporting incidences of sexual abuse and misconduct. Dye filed a counter suit to combat the allegations claiming that he and Gonya shared a consensual sexual relationship for several years.

Who is the Plaintiff?

The new lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in May 2015 by Marilyn K. Lahr. Lahr is the sister of Kathy Gonya, who was also appointed president of Dye’s Brigadoon Financial, Inc. in October 2012. She is a trial attorney who received her J.D. from Southern Methodist University, and currently operates a law practice in Fort Wayne.

What is the Lawsuit Alleging?

current-suit-accuses-dye-assault-batteryAccording to the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette, Lahr’s current suit accuses Dye himself of assault and battery, and his company Brigadoon Financial of negligent supervision and training, negligent retention, breach of contract, sexual harassment, and sexual retaliation. Lahr is also alleging that Dye groped her and attempted to enter her hotel room by force while they were on a business trip together in New Orleans.

What are the Next Steps?

Currently, Dye has retained Allen County Republican Party Chairman Steven Shine, a partner of Shine & Hardin, LLP, to defend him from the claims in both lawsuits. Through the counter suit against Gonya, Dye is seeking $1 million in damages both for himself and his company, Brigadoon Financial, and claims that Gonya attempted to extort him through her lawyer before the original suit was filed. According to a statement from Shine, the claims in Lahr’s and Gonya’s lawsuits are completely unfounded, and Dye is will continue to defend himself in court against them.