(360) 733-3773 Bellingham, WA

SHEPARD_ALLEN2

Understanding Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Following a Car Accident: Its Impact on Car Accident Claims

Posted by David Brown 
· September 10, 2020 

If someone is involved in a car accident, this can lead to serious complications. Even relatively minor car accident can still lead to serious injuries. What people think about injuries and complications following a car accident, they often think about bone fractures, head injuries, spinal cord injuries, and brain damage. On the other hand, there are also serious mental health issues and emotional problems that can arise as well. What are the most common problems that people might encounter is post-traumatic stress disorder, usually shortened to PTSD.

One of the most common causes of post-traumatic stress disorder is car accidents. Some of the factors that might influence the development of PTSD in a car accident at the severity of the injuries to other people, whether or not someone died, how long it takes to recover from certain injuries, and whether someone has a pre-existing history of mental health disorders.

For individuals who have developed PTSD, this can have a serious impact on their overall quality of life. For example, someone who suffers from PTSD might be unable to return to work immediately, which might have an impact on his or her ability to earn an income. There are also situations where someone who suffers from PTSD might have to seek the assistance of a trained healthcare professional. Clearly, PTSD can have tremendous Financial impacts on someone’s overall quality of life following a car accident as well.

Therefore, it is possible that PTSD might play a role in someone’s ability to seek damages following a car accident. If someone believes that they have developed PTSD following a car accident, it is important to seek the help of a trained medical professional as quickly as possible. Medical records can help support someone’s diagnosis of PTSD in the event they decide to seek damages.

Then, it is critical to enlist the help of a trained legal professional. There are a lot of nuances that go along with filing a personal injury lawsuit filing a car accident. With a legal professional to act as a guide, everyone can make sure that their rights are defended and that they recover damages that are commensurate with the injuries they have suffered.

Categories : News
Tags :

Indiana Woman Sues Over Recalled Hand Sanitizer

Posted by David Brown 
· September 8, 2020 

A woman from northern Indiana recently filed a lawsuit against the company that distributes hand sanitizer. The claims are over methanol, a toxic agent. The woman claimed that her children were suffering from severe side effects due to the hand sanitizer. The lawsuit is seeking penalties against 4e Brands North America, a Texas-based distributor of Blumen brand hand sanitizer. The FDA previously found that their products contained methanol, otherwise called wood alcohol, which is known to be a deadly toxin. The company voluntarily recalled their products back in July to avoid a lawsuit.

The woman claimed that her children were suffering from severe side effects including vomiting and headaches. The company is accused of violating the Deceptive Consumer Sales Act and Indiana’s Product Liability Act. The suit is requesting a class action status for the woman’s damages. The plaintiff believed that the hand sanitizer was safe when she bought them, it wasn’t until later that personal injury was experienced due to the use. This constitutes as deceptive acts as far as the plaintiff is concerned. The plaintiff is going to put together their argument in accordance with the idea that the hand sanitizer company willingly deceived her in this instance.

The Indiana Department of Health officials said that the number of deaths and positive tests of COVID-19 are on the rise. The plaintiff was using hand sanitizer as a way of combating the virus and keeping her family safe. There’s no statement from Blumen or 4e Brands North America that reflects whether the product was there intentionally or accidentally. At any rate, the side effects were measured and appropriate for a case such as this. It’s a matter of hearing how the defense will prepare their argument and whether or not other people were injured due to the same problem. As time goes on, more people might come forward and reveal that they have the same issue. The plaintiff hopes that her initial suit will bring enough popularity to the case for other people across the state and country to see. She believes that this was not an accident and that the recall was never done by the company.

Categories : News
Tags :

Liability Waiver: Can You Still File a Lawsuit After Signing One?

Posted by David Brown 
· August 25, 2020 

If you have ever participated in an event or activity that posed some sort of risk to your health or safety, you may have had to sign a liability waiver before participating. Some of the most common examples include skiing, jet skiing, jumping in a trampoline park, or even attending an amusement park. Essentially, this liability waiver has been put in place to prevent you from filing a lawsuit in the event that you get hurt or even killed while engaging in this activity. Even though it is possible for a liability waiver to help a business avoid certain lawsuits, there are some situations where you still might be able to file a lawsuit even if you sign a liability waiver and were later involved in an accident.

For example, despite a liability waiver, you may still be able to file a lawsuit against a business if the liability waiver violates public policy. Depending on where you are located, there may be specific laws that prevent the liability waiver from being enforceable. In this case, it is critical to meet with a legal professional who understands the local policies of the state. It is possible the liability waiver may be unenforceable in your specific situation.

In other situations, the business entity might have engaged in something called gross negligence. This takes place where there is an extreme indifference or reckless disregard for the safety, health, and well-being of the people participating in that activity. Of course, gross negligence has to be proven in a court of law. This is another situation where a legal professional can be helpful. If gross negligence took place, then he might be able to file a lawsuit despite a liability waiver.

Finally, there may be situations where the wording in the waiver clause ambiguous. In order for a liability waiver to be enforceable, it has to be clear what rights you are waving when you sign the document. If the language is ambiguous, unclear, or vague, then you might be able to file a lawsuit claiming that you were unable to fully understand what you were signing at the time. Regardless of the situation, it is critical for you to rely on the help of a trained legal professional to defend your rights.

Categories : News
Tags :

Medical Malpractice and Wrongful Death: Do They Mean the Same Thing?

Posted by David Brown 
· August 20, 2020 

One of the most common questions people have when they speak with a law firm is about the difference between medical malpractice and wrongful death. There are some people who believe these two terms cover the same thing. Even though it is true that these terms do have some overlap, there are a few differences that people need to know as well.

First, it is important to cover medical malpractice. This takes place when a healthcare provider, such as a doctor or a nurse, is negligent. This negligence has to lead to harm to the patient. When discussing medical malpractice, many people refer to the “Ds.” The provider has to have deviated from his or her duty to the patient. Then, this deviation has to result in damage. There are numerous types of medical malpractice. Some of the most common examples include:

  • Surgical mistakes
  • Overlooking a diagnosis of some type
  • Abuse that takes place in a nursing home
  • Mistakes involving medications
  • Birth injuries

Even though medical malpractice can result in the death of the patient in rare circumstances, not all types of medical malpractice lead to a patient’s death.

Of course, given the name, wrongful death has to result in the debt of someone. Therefore, it is possible that medical malpractice may lead to a wrongful death. On the other hand, not all forms of wrongful that involve medical malpractice. In addition to medical malpractice, there are numerous other situations where wrongful death might result. For example, some of the other examples include:

  • Negligence leading to a motor vehicle accident that results in the death of someone
  • Defective medical devices that might result in someone’s death
  • Consuming recalled food at a restaurant or a grocery store that results in the death of someone

Therefore, even though it is possible that wrongful death and medical malpractice can cover the same event, this is not always the case. There are a lot of nuances that accompany medical malpractice cases as well as wrongful death cases. Therefore, it is important for anyone with questions or concerns to rely on the help of a trained legal professional who has experience in both of these areas. Everyone deserves to have their rights defended.

Categories : News
Tags :

8 Ways to Avoid Serious Car Accident Injuries

Posted by David Brown 
· August 18, 2020 

Practicing defensive driving is the best way to avoid car accident injuries. Examples of defensive driving include eliminating distractions, staying focused on traffic conditions, using turn signals and driving within the speed limit. Additionally, make sure there is enough distance between your car and the car in front of you in case you have to react swiftly to an unexpected situation.

In addition to defensive driving, here are eight great ways to reduce your risk of suffering a car accident and possible serious injury:

1. Sit up straight while driving so that you can see clearly beyond the hood of your car and to the periphery of your vision field

2. Regularly have your car inspected and maintained to prevent accidents caused by bad brakes, low oil or transmission fluid levels (gear slipping, overheating engine) or bald tires.

3. Position driver and passenger seat to be as far from the air bag as possible. Sitting too close to a triggered airbag may cause skin burns or even fractures when the bag powerfully squeezes your body against the seat

4. Wear a seatbelt at all times. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control reports that nearly half of all car accident fatalities involved people who were not wearing a seatbelt

5. Proper steering wheel positioning improves your ability to handle your car in all traffic and weather conditions. Point the steering wheel more towards your chest rather than your face. Hands should be placed on the steering wheel in a “10:00 and 2:00” position.

6. Drive the speed limit. Speeding increases the risk of having an accident by nearly 30 percent. Going just five miles faster than the speed limit reduces your ability to control your vehicle, worsens the potential for serious injury and endangers the lives of other drivers and pedestrians

7. Keep your eyes on the road. Distracted driving is the leading cause worldwide of car accidents. Never eat, text, adjust radio/CD players or do anything else that takes your attention off the road

8. Don’t continue driving a car that is in mechanical distress. If your car is smoking, making loud noises or it feels like your steering wheel isn’t responding correctly, pull over and call for help

Unfortunately, taking steps to improve your own safety while driving can’t prevent other drivers from behaving recklessly. If you have been injured in a car accident through no fault of your own, contact our personal injury attorneys today.

Categories : News
Tags :

What do People Think About Lawsuits?

Posted by David Brown 
· August 11, 2020 

Everyone knows that lawsuits help retain the law and order in this country. It keeps people honest and allows everyone to have a fair relationship. We were curious about how people view lawsuits, so we took a look at a study. This study asked a thousand men and women across the country what they really think about lawsuits. The study did a good job of asking people from different backgrounds. The result is a study that pretty closely emulates the American peoples’ voices. The results are pretty interesting, and they’re worth sharing.

The major takeaway is that a majority of people would think about suing as long as it’s under the right conditions. In fact, over 95% of people said they would sue. Their reasoning behind it would range from them feeling wronged to there being a serious disturbance to their life. That’s nearly the entire country that’s in favor of suing. That leaves not even 5% of the total population in the belief that they would never sue anyone.

Interestingly, in the same study, nearly half of them would only refuse to sue if the person they had to sue was a loved one. They said they would never sue a loved one under any condition. The remaining half that said they would sue a loved one said that it would depend on how bad the injuries were and whether or not their loved one could pay for the victim’s medical bills through insurance. This is an important caveat to remember. Even though they would sue their loved one, it would only be in serious and absolutely necessary instances

Almost 1 in 5 people said that they would take part in dishonest behavior to win an accident settlement of $100,000. They answered that they might get into an accident on purpose or exaggerate how hurt they actually are. This raises some interesting questions about what a court can do to try to find this 20% of people walking around. Of course, these results are just on paper so it’s hard to say if someone actually would commit fraud like this.

Lawsuits have an impact on lives and what people think across the country think about them is interesting and worth talking about.

Categories : News
Tags :

Your Personal Injury Claim Can Be Saved with a Seatbelt

Posted by David Brown 
· August 6, 2020 

People don’t realize that seatbelts date way back to the 50s. It wasn’t until ’68 that it was legally required for seatbelts to be a part of new cars. Even then, it took a few more decades for them to really catch on and for laws to require you to wear a seatbelt while driving. Today, people decide to ditch the seatbelt so they can be more comfortable when they drive. Of course, these same people will feel very uncomfortable when it comes time to file a personal injury claim.

When someone gets hurt in a wreck, they can then file a personal injury lawsuit against the responsible driver. That is, unless the victim wasn’t wearing a seatbelt. Failure to wear a seatbelt dramatically affects whether or not a victim will get paid from filing a claim. A victim in this situation will actually share the fault of the accident according to the court. Using a “contributory negligence” counter-claim, the court will rule that the victim can’t get any money from another party since they are partially responsible. There are other negligence counter-claims that can be defended if this option doesn’t work. The moral of the story is that people who fail to buckle up before an accident will either have a drastically reduced payout, or they won’t get paid at all.

On top of that, the court also goes through a process where the plaintiff has to explain how they mitigated their damages. In a case where the plaintiff was in an accident, the court will ask them what steps they took to avoid the accident. Swerving, applying the brakes, and honking are examples of how someone could mitigate their damage. Most states determine that the failure to wear a seatbelt goes against this idea, and it fails to mitigate the damage of an accident. This is just another way that the failure to wear a seatbelt hurts someone in court.

Now, the previous examples are only the case if the damages were due to not wearing a seatbelt. If the plaintiff was injured in a car accident and it had nothing to do with whether or not they were wearing a seatbelt, these ideas don’t come into play.

Categories : News
Tags :

Social Media and Injury Claims

Posted by David Brown 
· August 4, 2020 

Today, there are hundreds of millions of people who use social media on a daily basis. Some of the most common social media platforms include Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Snapchat. Social media is a great way to not only go about digital marketing but also keep in touch with family members and friends. At the same time, if a lawsuit unfolds, someone’s social media information could be exposed during potential discovery motions or at trial. Therefore, it is important for everyone to understand how social media might impact the process of an injury claim.

Social media is commonly used during litigation to test the credibility of everyone involved and to vet a potential story. Therefore, everything on someone’s social media profiles might be involved. For example, statements made on social media might be used to prove that someone had prior knowledge of the incident. The timing of social media posts may also be relevant to an accident that might have taken place. Furthermore, social media could even be used to directly attack the character of a witness. For all of these reasons, people need to be cognizant of what they stand for on social media.

A common concern that people have is that they believe their social media information as private as long as they correct their settings. This is not always the case. Once something is on the internet, it is there forever. Furthermore, if there is a discovery motion filed, then the owner of that social media profile might be required to unveil everything on that profile to the other side.

Therefore, one of the common questions that many people have is whether or not they should delete their social media posts in the event of a trial. The answer is that they should absolutely not do this. Otherwise, this could be considered the destruction of evidence, which can significantly damage someone’s case. Instead, it is important for people to practice preventive measures. Everyone needs to think carefully about what they post on social media, knowing that this could be used against them one day. Furthermore, it is even better for people to let their own legal team know what is on their social media accounts. That way, they can plan accordingly.

Categories : News
Tags :

Washington State Temporarily Waives Bar Exam Requirements for Young Lawyers

Posted by David Brown 
· July 28, 2020 

The coronavirus pandemic has impacted everyone in this includes the legal industry. When people think about how the legal industry has been impacted by the pandemic, they often focus on virtual court hearings and the impact of people sitting behind bars without access to adequate legal representation. On the other hand, the coronavirus pandemic is also allowing some people to practice law without having to pass the bar exam. Of course, this is temporary.

Traditionally, students spend several years going to law school and studying for the bar exam in order to be allowed to enter the courtroom as a trained, legal professional. Unfortunately, right now, taking the bar exam is a challenge. Standardized testing during the pandemic is hard because students are usually tucked into tight quarters, facilitating viral transmission. Washington State has a desperate need for lawyers right now. Therefore, they have temporarily waived the requirement that individuals pass the bar exam after finishing law school before they are allowed to practice law.

With numerous people allowed to practice law for a short period of time without having to take the bar exam, it will be interesting to see what happens next. Many people have praised the decision from Washington State to allow people to practice law without passing the bar exam for now. On the other hand, there are some people who are concerned that not passing the bar exam might lead to wider disparities in the quality of legal representation that people have access to.

At the same time, it is still important for everyone to make sure that they understand that this waiver is temporary. In the end, students are still going to have to pass the bar exam in order to practice law in the state of Washington and around the country. Therefore, lawyers are still going to be held to the same legal standards as they were in the past. For now, this waiver represents a temporary reprieve for law students who have put themselves through the gauntlet in order to practice law. It is nice that they no longer have to put their careers on hold simply because of viruses prohibiting them from taking the bar exam.

Categories : News
Tags :

Understanding Your Personal Injury Award

Posted by David Brown 
· July 23, 2020 

Personal injury claims can result in large settlements. These typically contain numerous types of awards. Each award recoups some of the income lost, enjoyment of life, medical expenses, or damages incurred due to the injury. When an individual or company acts with negligence to cause harm, the injured individual can sue for appropriate and fair compensation. The award may contain any of the following types of compensatory damage awards.

Medical Bills

Typically, you will receive compensation for all medical bills. Keep all receipts and document costs such as medical transportation. The negligent party’s insurance pays out of court settlement’s up to the policy maximum. If you sue and it goes to court, the award may also include out of pocket payments by the injuring party to completely cover the medical costs.

Lost Wages

When you miss work due to an injury, you should document the time you had to miss. Your employer can help you with this. You may claim leave under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), but that leave could be unpaid. You can sue to have your missed time from work compensated. You can also receive compensation for reduced shifts or hours that you took because you could not work a full day.

Non-economic Damages

Also called pain and suffering damages, these include emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, inability to partake in previous activities or hobbies, and other intangibles. These injuries typically stem from a court settlement. A judge or jury determines the award. In other situations, a mediator may arbitrate a fair pain and suffering award.

Other Expenses

Due to your injury, you may not capably perform your household duties, requiring you to hire a housekeeper or nanny. You may need a lawn service to mow your yard if you cannot. Those items and others like them you can also receive compensation for in a damages award.

Another type of damages exists besides compensatory. Punitive damages quantify a method of punishing the individual for doing the injured party harm. The arbitrator may negotiate these or a judge or jury may award them. When you read about a lawsuit that resulted in an award of millions of dollars, it probably includes punitive damages. Occasionally, the injuring party appeals an award. The higher court may overturn that of the lower court or reduce the damage award.

Lump Sums vs. Structured Settlements

Smaller settlements may come in the form of a lump sum payment, but large awards may come in the form of a structured settlement. This disburses the payment on an annual or monthly basis so the income flows un as an earned income would have. This reduces the taxes owed on it at both the state and federal level. This provides a steady stream of income so the injured party can pay for ongoing medical care costs.

Categories : News
Tags :
← Previous Page
Next Page →

Bellingham Office:

2011 Young Street
Suite 202
Bellingham, WA  98225
(360) 733-3773 or 647-4567
(360) 647-9060 (facsimile)
info@saalawoffice.com

shepard_allen