(360) 733-3773 Bellingham, WA

SHEPARD_ALLEN2

Archive for Personal injury

Wrongful Death at WA Construction Sites – Legal Options for Grieving Families

Posted by David Brown 
· August 21, 2025 

Wrongful Death at WA Construction Sites – Legal Options for Grieving Families

Construction work is one of the most dangerous jobs in Washington. When safety measures fail and a worker dies on-site, families are left not just grieving — but seeking justice. Wrongful death lawsuits allow loved ones to hold companies accountable and recover financial support after tragedy strikes.

What counts as a wrongful death in construction? Falls from heights, heavy equipment accidents, electrocution, trench collapses, and being struck by machinery are all leading causes. But it’s not just the incident — it’s about the cause. If safety protocols were ignored, if equipment was faulty, or if supervision was lacking, that opens the door to legal action.

Is workers’ compensation enough? No — it rarely covers the full impact. While Washington’s workers’ comp system does provide some death benefits, it limits liability for employers. But when third parties — like subcontractors, equipment manufacturers, or property owners — contribute to the death, families can file a separate civil claim for full compensation.

What damages can be recovered? Families can pursue losses for funeral expenses, lost future earnings, medical bills, and loss of companionship. If the company’s conduct was reckless — such as failing repeated safety inspections — punitive damages may also apply.

How long do families have to file? Washington’s statute of limitations for wrongful death is generally three years, but that timeline can be complex in construction cases. If the cause of death isn’t clear right away — or involves multiple parties — it’s critical to speak with a lawyer early to preserve evidence.

What evidence is needed? Site photographs, witness statements, OSHA reports, safety logs, prior violation records, and expert analysis of the accident scene all help prove liability. In fatal equipment incidents, attorneys may call in engineers or product safety specialists.

Do these lawsuits make a difference? Yes. While no amount of money can replace a loved one, successful cases often force companies to improve safety — and prevent future tragedies. Families find closure knowing that their actions may protect others down the line.

Who can file the lawsuit? In Washington, the spouse, children, or personal representative of the deceased’s estate may bring a wrongful death claim. If the victim had no dependents, parents or siblings may be eligible under certain conditions.

A sudden death on the job should never be dismissed as “just an accident.” If you’ve lost someone in a construction site tragedy, you don’t have to stay silent. Legal action can be your path to justice — and accountability.

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , ,

Foster Care Abuse Claims in Washington – Accountability for State and Private Agencies

Posted by David Brown 
· August 19, 2025 

Foster Care Abuse Claims in Washington – Accountability for State and Private Agencies

Foster care is supposed to provide safety. For too many children in Washington, it’s become the opposite. Abuse, neglect, and exploitation are on the rise in foster homes, group homes, and state-supervised facilities. And when the system fails to protect the most vulnerable — legal accountability becomes not just possible, but necessary.

What happens when a foster child is harmed by the very system meant to care for them? In Washington, victims can bring civil claims against the state, private foster care agencies, or individuals responsible for the abuse. These claims often focus on negligent placement, failure to supervise, or failure to remove the child from a dangerous situation after clear warning signs.

Is it difficult to sue the state? It’s more complex — but absolutely possible. Under Washington’s Tort Claims Act, the state can be held liable for negligence in managing the foster care system. That includes placing children with known abusers, ignoring reports of harm, or failing to screen foster parents properly.

What about private agencies? Many foster care services are contracted out to private nonprofits or third-party providers. If those organizations failed in their duty of care — through poor hiring practices, inadequate training, or falsifying records — they can be sued just like any business. In some cases, claims can name both the state and the private agency.

How long do survivors have to file a claim? Washington has extended the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse, allowing many survivors to seek justice years or even decades after the harm occurred. But deadlines can vary based on the type of abuse and when the survivor realized its impact — so early legal advice is critical.

What counts as evidence in foster abuse cases? Medical records, therapy notes, school documents, and foster placement files can all be part of the case. Testimony from teachers, caseworkers, other children in the home, and even neighbors can support claims. In some cases, internal emails or agency memos uncovered during discovery reveal systemic failures that go far beyond a single child.

What kind of compensation is available? Damages often include costs for therapy, medical care, educational disruption, and pain and suffering. In some cases — especially when a pattern of abuse or cover-up is proven — punitive damages may be awarded to send a clear message to the system.

These lawsuits do more than compensate victims. They force change. When agencies face public scrutiny and legal consequences, policies improve. Oversight increases. And future harm is prevented.

If you or someone you know suffered abuse in Washington’s foster care system, now is the time to speak up. The harm may have started in childhood — but the law is ready to listen today.

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , ,

Nursing Home Neglect – Understaffing in WA Facilities

Posted by David Brown 
· August 14, 2025 

Nursing Home Neglect – Understaffing in WA Facilities

When families place a loved one in a nursing home, they expect care, attention, and safety. But in Washington and across the country, chronic understaffing is creating dangerous conditions that lead to neglect — and sometimes irreversible harm. Understaffed nursing homes can’t provide basic hygiene, medication management, fall prevention, or even timely food and water.

Is understaffing really a legal issue? Yes. When a facility fails to meet state-mandated staffing ratios or knowingly operates with too few aides and nurses, that can qualify as neglect. Neglect becomes abuse when it causes harm — bedsores, infections, dehydration, malnutrition, emotional trauma, or death.

Families often don’t discover the neglect until it’s too late. A sudden decline in health, weight loss, bruises, or a pressure ulcer may be the first visible signs. Staff may downplay the situation, claiming the injuries were unavoidable. But with proper staffing and supervision, most of these harms can be prevented.

What rights do families have? In Washington, families can file a civil claim for nursing home abuse or neglect. These claims can target not just the employees, but the corporate owners of the facility — especially if financial decisions led to understaffing, poor hiring practices, or falsified records. The law allows compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and in some cases, punitive damages.

How can you prove neglect? It often requires investigation. Time-stamped logs, nurse shift schedules, medical charts, surveillance footage, and witness interviews can reveal whether care was missed or delayed. State inspection reports and complaint histories can also strengthen a claim.

One common sign is repeated hospitalizations — especially for preventable issues like urinary tract infections, sepsis, or falls. Another red flag: the same few staff members covering multiple halls or constantly rotating shifts. If employees appear overwhelmed or the facility has high turnover, it could point to an unsafe environment.

What about nursing homes that blame COVID-19? While the pandemic did strain resources, it doesn’t excuse negligence. Washington law still requires facilities to protect residents — and understaffing was already a problem before the pandemic began. Courts are now seeing an increase in post-COVID cases where families allege that facilities used the pandemic as a cover for long-standing safety issues.

Is it worth taking legal action? For many families, the goal isn’t just compensation — it’s justice and accountability. Legal pressure forces companies to change their staffing models, raise wages for aides, and prioritize resident safety over profit. A successful claim can also help other families avoid the same tragedy.

If you notice signs of neglect — or just have a gut feeling something’s wrong — you have the right to request records, demand answers, and get a second opinion. Don’t let corporate excuses bury the truth. Your loved one’s life deserves better.

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , ,

E‑Bike and E‑Scooter Lithium Battery Explosions – Product Liability and Consumer Danger

Posted by David Brown 
· August 12, 2025 

E‑Bike and E‑Scooter Lithium Battery Explosions – Product Liability and Consumer Danger

E-bikes and e-scooters are everywhere — from city streets to delivery fleets to suburban garages. But behind the convenience lies a growing legal risk: lithium-ion battery fires. These devices have sparked lawsuits across the country, including in Washington, where injured riders and homeowners are beginning to hold manufacturers accountable for fires, burns, and property damage caused by defective or poorly made batteries.

What happens when your mode of transportation becomes a fire hazard? Lithium-ion batteries can overheat, explode, or ignite when they’re overcharged, punctured, exposed to high temperatures, or manufactured with internal defects. For some, the danger doesn’t appear until the scooter is parked inside a home, or the battery is charging silently in a garage.

The central legal issue is product liability. Were the batteries properly tested? Did the manufacturer issue appropriate warnings? Was the charger included with the device UL-certified? These questions determine whether a manufacturer or retailer is responsible for injuries caused by thermal runaway — the chemical reaction that can trigger an explosion or fire in faulty batteries.

Is the manufacturer always liable? Not always — but in many cases, they are. If a battery was defectively designed, poorly assembled, or lacked safety mechanisms, that’s grounds for strict liability. Retailers may also be responsible if they failed to warn customers, sold devices without proper certifications, or ignored safety recalls. In some cases, victims may also have claims against importers or shipping companies, especially when the product was sourced from overseas and sold in the U.S. market.

Do riders have any responsibility? Riders may be accused of misusing the device, overcharging the battery, or exposing it to moisture. But most e-bike and scooter owners use these devices exactly as intended. When something explodes during routine use — or while charging overnight — the courts often side with consumers, especially when no clear warning was provided.

What evidence helps in a battery fire case? Photos of the damaged device, the charging area, and any remaining packaging can be critical. So can surveillance video, receipts, and the device’s instruction manual. In many cases, the battery itself is sent to a forensic lab for testing. Attorneys often bring in battery experts or electrical engineers to reconstruct what went wrong and why.

Why does this matter to homeowners and tenants? E-bike battery fires can cause serious structural damage. If your insurance claim is denied or underpaid, a product liability claim may be your best path to full compensation — not just for physical injuries, but for property loss, temporary relocation, and emotional trauma.

As micromobility devices grow in popularity, the need for legal accountability grows with them. Cities may adopt stricter regulations. But for now, the burden often falls on individual consumers to fight back after an injury — and make sure dangerous products are pulled from the market before someone else gets hurt.

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , ,

Industrial Airborne Chemical Exposure in WA – Building a Toxic Injury Case

Posted by David Brown 
· August 7, 2025 

Industrial Airborne Chemical Exposure in WA – Building a Toxic Injury Case

In Washington, workers exposed to airborne industrial chemicals often don’t realize the harm until it’s too late. From paint vapors to cleaning agents to insulation dust, chemical exposure can silently attack the lungs, nervous system, and long-term health. When that exposure causes illness, the legal path to compensation can be complex — but not impossible.

What happens when your body absorbs damage day after day, but the signs don’t show up for years? That’s the core issue in many toxic exposure claims. Unlike a sudden injury like a car accident, chemical exposure often develops slowly. Workers might report headaches, dizziness, or coughing long before doctors connect the symptoms to chemical contact at work. And by the time they do, the employer’s records may be incomplete — or missing entirely.

Can you still file a claim if you didn’t realize you were exposed until years later? In many cases, yes. Washington law allows for toxic injury claims even after symptoms develop slowly, especially when the worker couldn’t reasonably discover the harm at the time of exposure. But it requires strong evidence — not just of the illness, but of the chemical, the exposure levels, and the path from workplace to injury.

Employers and manufacturers may argue that the worker’s symptoms came from another source — smoking, genetics, or a hobby. That’s why documentation becomes crucial. Medical records, witness testimony, job site photos, OSHA complaints, and even leftover materials from the site can become evidence in a toxic exposure case. So can expert analysis from industrial hygienists or toxicologists.

What if you were using protective gear? That’s not always a defense. If the employer provided inadequate protection, failed to train workers properly, or ignored safety complaints, they can still be held accountable — especially if the gear didn’t meet industry standards or wasn’t available when needed.

Is it always the employer who’s liable? Not necessarily. Third-party contractors, product manufacturers, or building owners may be at fault too. In Washington, workers’ compensation may cover part of the medical costs — but it doesn’t stop injured workers from suing third parties for full damages. That’s how many toxic exposure cases succeed: by identifying who provided the chemical, who failed to warn about it, or who ignored known hazards.

These cases aren’t just about one person’s health. They often reveal larger safety issues that put dozens or hundreds of workers at risk. When one victim steps forward, others often follow — and companies are forced to change.

What’s the long-term impact of winning a toxic injury case? For many workers, it means covering years of medical care, compensating for lost income, and ensuring their families aren’t left behind. It also sends a message to industries that exposure to dangerous chemicals isn’t just a cost of doing business — it’s a preventable harm, and they can be held accountable.

If you or someone you know is dealing with unexplained chronic illness after working in construction, factories, shipyards, or other chemical-heavy industries, it may be time to ask harder questions. Your health isn’t just a mystery. It may be evidence.

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , ,

Washington Supreme Court – Third‑Party Liability in Multi‑Truck Crashes

Posted by David Brown 
· August 5, 2025 

Washington Supreme Court – Third‑Party Liability in Multi‑Truck Crashes

When multiple trucks collide on Washington highways, the aftermath is often devastating. But beyond the immediate injuries and property damage lies a critical legal question: who can be held responsible? A recent review by the Washington Supreme Court highlights the growing importance of third‑party liability in truck accidents — cases where companies other than the employer may share legal responsibility.

Imagine a chain‑reaction crash involving a delivery truck, a contracted maintenance provider, and a parts supplier. Most people assume the truck driver’s employer carries all the liability. But what happens when evidence shows that faulty maintenance, defective brakes, or subcontracted negligence contributed to the accident? In those situations, victims may have claims against multiple parties beyond the driver’s company.

Why does this matter to injured drivers and passengers? Truck crashes often cause catastrophic harm — spinal injuries, traumatic brain injuries, and permanent disability. The costs can quickly surpass basic insurance limits. Identifying all responsible parties ensures victims can access the compensation they need for medical bills, lost wages, and long‑term care. It also encourages accountability throughout the supply chain, from manufacturers to maintenance contractors.

The court’s review emphasized the importance of investigating the entire ecosystem of responsibility. Plaintiffs’ attorneys are increasingly examining:

  • Manufacturers – Did defective brakes, tires, or steering components play a role?
  • Maintenance Contractors – Were inspection logs falsified or service skipped to save costs?
  • Freight Brokers and Shippers – Did they pressure drivers to operate beyond safe hours or overload cargo?

One embedded question emerges: How often do crashes happen because every company involved assumed someone else would handle safety? This legal scrutiny shifts some focus away from just the driver and employer, widening the lens to corporate practices that can quietly create risk.

For injured victims, timing is critical. Washington has strict statutes of limitation on personal injury claims, and evidence can vanish quickly — skid marks fade, maintenance logs are shredded, and black box data can be overwritten. Acting quickly with a qualified attorney allows for subpoenas and preservation letters that lock down vital records before they disappear.

This focus on third‑party liability also serves the community at large. When manufacturers, contractors, and shippers know they can be held accountable, they are more likely to maintain safe practices. And that means fewer catastrophic pile‑ups on I‑5, Highway 2, and other busy freight corridors.

Ultimately, multi‑truck crashes are about more than one bad moment on the road. They are about the systems that allowed that moment to happen. The Washington Supreme Court’s review signals that responsibility can extend far beyond the cab of the truck, and that victims have more paths to justice than ever before.

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , ,

Camp Lejeune Toxic Water Lawsuit Expands to Contractors

Posted by David Brown 
· May 27, 2025 

Camp Lejeune Toxic Water Lawsuit Expands to Contractors

Victims of toxic water exposure at Camp Lejeune, a U.S. Marine Corps base in North Carolina, have expanded their legal battle by filing new lawsuits against private contractors who allegedly played a role in the decades-long contamination. The lawsuits claim that these third-party companies either failed to report the dangers or contributed directly to the pollution of the base’s water supply.

From the 1950s through the late 1980s, hundreds of thousands of Marines, their families, and civilian workers were exposed to water contaminated with dangerous chemicals like trichloroethylene (TCE), perchloroethylene (PCE), benzene, and vinyl chloride—substances linked to cancer, birth defects, and neurological issues.

Until recently, most lawsuits focused on the federal government. But thanks to recent amendments under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, victims now have a clearer path to sue private contractors involved in facility maintenance, waste disposal, and environmental monitoring. Plaintiffs argue that these companies knew or should have known about the risks and failed to act.

The expanded lawsuits allege that contractors negligently installed and maintained leaking fuel tanks, dumped toxic waste near water supplies, and ignored test results that flagged contamination levels above federal safety thresholds. Attorneys claim the contractors prioritized cost-cutting and speed over public health, contributing to one of the worst environmental scandals in military history.

Lawyers representing victims say the litigation is a key step in uncovering the full extent of responsibility and recovering compensation for decades of pain and illness. “Holding contractors accountable is just as important as holding the government accountable,” said one attorney representing several families. “Everyone involved in allowing this tragedy to continue must face justice.”

Many plaintiffs include former service members suffering from leukemia, Parkinson’s disease, bladder cancer, and infertility—conditions widely documented in connection to long-term exposure to the contaminants present in Camp Lejeune’s water.

Legal experts believe these lawsuits could open the door to similar claims at other contaminated military sites, particularly as more transparency laws emerge around environmental hazards and contractor accountability.

The federal government has paid out over $2 billion in health-related claims tied to Camp Lejeune so far, and the growing number of lawsuits could dramatically increase the financial liability across public and private sectors. Some contractors named in the suits have denied wrongdoing, stating they followed federal guidance at the time.

The case adds momentum to broader calls for reform in how environmental health risks are managed at military bases. Advocates continue to push for mandatory third-party oversight and stricter environmental review processes.

As the first wave of contractor trials prepares to begin later this year, victims and their families remain hopeful that justice will finally be delivered—not just in words, but in court.

 

 

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , , , ,

Family Sues Over In-Custody Death of Jaleen Anderson in Harris County Jail

Posted by David Brown 
· April 3, 2025 

Family Sues Over In-Custody Death of Jaleen Anderson in Harris County Jail

The family of Jaleen Anderson has filed a lawsuit against Harris County, Texas, and Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, alleging gross negligence and civil rights violations that led to Anderson’s death while in custody. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims that Anderson was denied necessary medical care while suffering from serious health issues, ultimately resulting in his untimely death.

According to the legal complaint, Anderson, 29, was booked into the Harris County Jail on a minor charge. During his incarceration, he reportedly began exhibiting signs of serious medical distress, including vomiting, severe fatigue, and difficulty breathing. The family alleges that Anderson repeatedly requested medical assistance but was ignored or dismissed by jail personnel.

Anderson’s condition continued to deteriorate over several days. The lawsuit claims that not only was he denied timely treatment, but his medical complaints were mocked by staff, who allegedly accused him of faking symptoms. When Anderson finally received medical attention, it was too late. He died shortly afterward in the jail’s infirmary.

The family’s attorneys argue that the Harris County Jail has a history of medical negligence and inadequate inmate care. They cite previous incidents in which detainees died or suffered serious complications due to delayed or denied medical attention. The lawsuit claims that systemic failures within the jail’s healthcare system, as well as poor training and supervision of staff, contributed directly to Anderson’s death.

Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and Harris County officials have not commented publicly on the specifics of the lawsuit, citing ongoing litigation. However, in a general statement, the sheriff’s office noted its commitment to transparency and its cooperation with external investigations. Internal reviews of Anderson’s case are said to be ongoing.

Legal experts say this case could set a powerful precedent if the court finds in favor of the Anderson family. In-custody deaths are increasingly drawing public scrutiny, particularly in jails with documented histories of neglect or abuse. A successful lawsuit could force Harris County to overhaul its jail medical policies, improve training for corrections officers, and potentially face financial penalties.

The lawsuit has drawn support from civil rights organizations and advocates for prison reform. Groups like the ACLU have called for independent oversight of correctional healthcare systems, arguing that incarcerated individuals often suffer due to substandard care and lack of accountability. Anderson’s case is being seen as emblematic of these broader concerns.

For the Anderson family, the lawsuit is about more than compensation—it’s about justice and ensuring that no other family suffers the same loss. “Jaleen was a son, a brother, a human being,” said one family member during a press conference. “He deserved compassion and care, not neglect and cruelty.”

While the case is still in its early stages, it highlights a growing trend of litigation aimed at holding correctional institutions accountable for inmate treatment. If successful, the Anderson family’s suit could inspire similar actions in other jurisdictions and increase pressure for systemic reform.

 

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , ,

Why Personal Injury Lawyers Are Essential for Justice and Fair Compensation

Posted by David Brown 
· October 31, 2024 

Why Personal Injury Lawyers Are Essential for Justice and Fair Compensation

Accidents can happen to anyone, anywhere, at any time. Whether it’s a car crash, a slip and fall, or a workplace incident, injuries often follow. But what happens after the accident? Who ensures that the injured person gets the help they need to recover both physically and financially? This is where personal injury lawyers play a crucial role.

Personal Injury Lawyers Protect Your Rights

When someone is injured due to someone else’s negligence, they often find themselves facing medical bills, lost wages, and other expenses. While insurance companies might seem like they’re on your side, their primary goal is to protect their bottom line. This often means offering the smallest settlement possible or finding reasons to deny your claim altogether.

A personal injury lawyer fights to make sure that injured parties receive the compensation they deserve. They represent individuals who have been hurt, not large corporations or insurance companies. They understand the tactics used to minimize payouts and can build a strong case to counter them.

Who Do Personal Injury Lawyers Represent?

Personal injury lawyers represent those who have suffered physical, emotional, or financial harm due to someone else’s actions. This could include victims of car accidents, medical malpractice, or defective products. They ensure that the responsible parties are held accountable and that the injured receive fair compensation for their pain and suffering.

Imagine being hit by a car while crossing the street. You’re left with a broken leg, medical bills piling up, and no way to work. The driver’s insurance company might try to downplay the extent of your injuries or blame you for the accident. Without a personal injury lawyer, you could be left to navigate this complex process alone, potentially receiving far less compensation than you need or deserve.

Why Representation Matters

Legal proceedings can be complicated and overwhelming, especially when you’re recovering from an injury. Personal injury lawyers handle all aspects of your case, allowing you to focus on healing. They gather evidence, negotiate with insurance companies, and, if necessary, represent you in court.

Having a lawyer also levels the playing field. Insurance companies have teams of lawyers working to protect their interests. Without a skilled attorney on your side, you’re at a significant disadvantage. Personal injury lawyers know the laws and understand how to present your case in the best light. They can help you get compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and more.

The Importance of Holding Responsible Parties Accountable

Accidents often happen because someone was careless or negligent. Personal injury lawyers help ensure that those responsible are held accountable. This not only helps the victim but also serves as a reminder to others to act responsibly. For example, if a company is sued for selling a defective product, they might be more careful in the future, potentially preventing others from getting hurt.

Injuries can have a lasting impact on your life. It’s not just about the immediate medical costs but also the long-term effects on your health, your ability to work, and your overall quality of life. A personal injury lawyer works to secure compensation that reflects all aspects of your suffering.

Why You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer

If you’ve been injured, you might think you can handle the situation on your own. However, even if your case seems straightforward, it’s easy to make mistakes that could cost you thousands of dollars. A personal injury lawyer has the experience and knowledge to navigate the complexities of your case.

They can provide valuable advice on what to do after an accident, how to deal with insurance adjusters, and what kind of compensation you should expect. They can also help you understand your rights and what options are available to you.

Conclusion

In times of injury and uncertainty, having a personal injury lawyer on your side can make all the difference. They are your advocates, fighting for your rights and ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve. Don’t leave your future to chance; if you’ve been injured, seek the help of a personal injury lawyer to protect your interests and hold those responsible accountable.

Categories : News
Tags : , , , ,

Injured, Don’t Navigate The Complex Legal System Alone

Posted by David Brown 
· May 18, 2023 

If you have been injured due to the negligence of another person or party, hiring a personal injury lawyer can be extremely beneficial. Here are some of the main benefits of having a personal injury lawyer:

  1. Legal Knowledge: A personal injury lawyer has specialized knowledge and expertise in the field of personal injury law. They will understand the relevant laws and regulations and can help you navigate the complex legal system.
  2. Protect your rights: Your lawyer will work to protect your rights and ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve. They will handle negotiations with insurance companies and can represent you in court if necessary.
  3. Maximize Compensation: Personal injury lawyers will work hard to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation possible for your injuries. They will calculate your damages, including medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other related expenses, to determine the value of your case.
  4. Evidence: Your lawyer will gather evidence and build a strong case on your behalf. They will work with medical professionals, accident reconstruction experts, and other relevant parties to help prove your case.
  5. Experience: Personal injury lawyers have experience dealing with insurance companies and other parties involved in personal injury cases. They know the tactics used by insurance companies to minimize settlements and can use this knowledge to help you receive the compensation you deserve.
  6. Save Time and Reduce Stress: Hiring a personal injury lawyer can save you time and reduce stress during a difficult time. Your lawyer will handle all aspects of your case, including negotiations with insurance companies, filing paperwork, and representing you in court if necessary.
  7. Contingency Fee: Many personal injury lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means that they only get paid if you receive a settlement or verdict in your favor. This can be beneficial because it means that your lawyer has an incentive to work hard to ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve.

In summary, hiring a personal injury lawyer can be extremely beneficial if you have been injured due to the negligence of another person or party. They will protect your rights, maximize your compensation, and help you navigate the complex legal system. Hiring a personal injury lawyer can also save you time and reduce stress during a difficult time.

Categories : News
Tags : , ,
Next Page »

Bellingham Office:

2011 Young Street
Suite 202
Bellingham, WA  98225
(360) 733-3773 or 647-4567
(360) 647-9060 (facsimile)
info@saalawoffice.com

shepard_allen